1887
Volume 28 Number 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

A

The iterative estimation process of residual static corrections published earlier is further analyzed.

The convergence and convergence rate of the iterative solution are analysed for components of different relative wave length with results of both theoretical and practical value.

Relative wave length components practically determinable and indeterminable are defined.

One model example is presented for illustrative purposes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1980.tb01219.x
2006-04-27
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HileanJ.A., EmbreeP. and PfluegerJ.C.1968, Automated static corrections, Geophysical Prospecting16, 326–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LánczosC.1961, Linear Differential Operators, D. Van Nostrand, London .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MartsukG.I. and KuznecovJ.A.1975, Methods of numerical mathematics, Iterative methods and quadratic functionals (in Russian), NAUKA, Novosibirsk .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SághyG. and ZeleiA.1975, Advanced method for self‐adaptive estimation of residual static corrections, Geophysical Prospecting23, 259–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. TanerM.T., KoehlerF. and AlhilaliK.A.1974, Estimation and correction of near‐surface time anomalies, Geophysical Prospecting39, 441–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WigginsR.A., LarnerK.L. and WisecupR.D.Residual statics analysis as a general linear inverse problem, Geophysics41, 922–938.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1980.tb01219.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error