1887

Abstract

Quality of seismic data acquired over land fields, is usually harmed by obstacles and different activities associated with oil production. Noise generated by a variety of artificial lift methods, noisy engines, buried or aerial tubes, compressor stations and many other facilities typical of production areas demand huge effort from seismic crews to monitor their impact and interrupt their activities whenever possible. However, those interruptions are not very popular among field engineers, not only because of reduction on oil production but it may cause as well, severe damage to field equipment through precipitation of paraffin on tubes, which result in losses on fields productivity. On this work we used micro spreads to evaluate the impact of different lift methods and proposed alternatives to the strategy of seismic acquisition on production areas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.195.1679_evt_6year_2009
2009-08-24
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.195.1679_evt_6year_2009
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error