1887
Volume 36 Number 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A model of parallel slip interfaces simulates the behaviour of a fracture system composed of large, closely spaced, aligned joints. The model admits any fracture system anisotropy: triclinic (the most general), monoclinic, orthorhombic or transversely isotropic, and this is specified by the form of the 3 × 3 fracture system compliance matrix. The fracture system may be embedded in an anisotropic elastic background with no restrictions on the type of anisotropy. To compute the long wavelength equivalent moduli of the fractured medium requires at most the inversion of two 3 × 3 matrices. When the fractures are assumed on average to have rotational symmetry (transversely isotropic fracture system behaviour) and the background is assumed isotropic, the resulting equivalent medium is transversely isotropic and the effect of the additional compliance of the fracture system may be specified by two parameters (in addition to the two isotropic parameters of the isotropic background). Dilute systems of flat aligned microcracks in an isotropic background yield an equivalent medium of the same form as that of the isotropic medium with large joints, i.e. there are two additional parameters due to the presence of the microcracks which play roles in the stress‐strain relations of the equivalent medium identical to those played by the parameters due to the presence of large joints. Thus, knowledge of the total of four parameters describing the anisotropy of such a fractured medium tells nothing of the size or concentration of the aligned fractures but does contain information as to the overall excess compliance due to the fracture system and its orientation. As the aligned microcracks, which were assumed to be ellipsoidal, with very small aspect ratio are allowed to become non‐fiat, i.e. have a growing aspect ratio, the moduli of the equivalent medium begin to diverge from the standard form of the moduli for flat cracks. The divergence is faster for higher crack densities but only becomes significant for microcracks of aspect ratios approaching 0.3.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02181.x
2006-04-27
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BACKUS, G.E.1962. Long‐wave anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research66, 4427–4440.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CRaMPIN, S.1984. Effective anisotropic elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society76, 135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CRaMPIN, S.1985. Evidence for aligned cracks in the Earth's crust. First Break3, (3), 12–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CRaMPIN, S. and ATKINSON, B.K.1985. Microcracks in the Earth's crust. First Break3, (3), 16–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CRaMPIN, S. and BUSH, I.1986. Shear waves revealed, extensive‐dilatancy anisotropy confirmed. 56th S.E.G. meeting, Houston , Expanded Abstracts, 481–484.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HELBIG, K. and SCHOENBERG, M.1987. Anomalous polarization of elastic waves in transversely isotropic media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America81, 1235–1245.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HOENIG, A.1979. Elastic moduli of a non‐randomly cracked body. International Journal of Solids and Structures15, 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HUDSON, J.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MORLand, L.W.1974. Elastic response of regularly jointed media. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society37, 435–446.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MUSGRaVE, M.J.P.1970. Crystal Acoustics, 84–86. Holden‐Day, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NISHIZaWa, O.1982. Seismic velocity in a medium containing oriented cracks–transversely isotropic case. Journal of the Physics of the Earth30, 331–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHOENBERG, M.1980. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68, 1516–1521.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHOENBERG, M.1983. Reflection of elastic waves from periodically stratified media with interfacial slip. Geophysical Prospecting31, 265–292.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SCHOENBERG, M. and MUIR, F.1988. Group theoretic methods for finely layered media. Geophysics (submitted).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. THOMSEN, L.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. THOMSEN, L.1988. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society (submitted).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. WILLIS, H.A., RETHFORD, G.L. and BIELaNSKI, E.1986. Azimuthal anisotropy, occurrence and effect on shear‐wave data quality. 56th S.E.G. meeting, Houston , Expanded Abstracts, 479–481.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02181.x
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error