A new concept in Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity anomalies [Link]

References

1. AbdelrahmanE.M. & SharafeldinS.M.1995 a. A least‐squares minimization approach to shape determination from gravity data. Geophysics60, 589590.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AbdelrahmanE.M. & SharafeldinS.M.1995 b. A least‐squares minimization approach to depth determination from numerical horizontal gravity gradients. Geophysics60, 12591260.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarbosaV.C.F., SilvaJ.B.C., MedeirosW.E.1999. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution. Geophysics64, 4860.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BarongoJ.1984. Euler's differential equation and the interpretation of the magnetic point‐pole and point‐dipole source. Geophysics49, 15491553.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CassanoE. & RoccaF.1975. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using spectral estimation techniques. Geophysical Prospecting23, 663681.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ClaerboutJ.F.1976. Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. Kingsport Press.
7. DobrinM.B.1984. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
8. FairheadJ.D., BennettK.J., GordonD.R.H., HuangD.1994. Euler: beyond the ‘black box’. 64th SEG meeting, Los Angeles, USA, Extended Abstracts, 422424.
9. GolubG.1965. Numerical methods for solving linear least‐squares problems. Numerische Mathematik7, 206216.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GranserH.1987. Non‐linear inversion of gravity data using the Schmidt‐Lichtenstein approach. Geophysics52, 8893.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GrantF.S. & WestG.F.1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
12. GuptaO.P.1983. A least‐squares approach to depth determination from gravity data. Geophysics48, 357360.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HoodP.1965. Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying. Geophysics30, 891902.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KeatingP.B.1998. Weighted Euler deconvolution of gravity data. Geophysics63, 15951603.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KlingeleE.E., MarsonI., KahleH.G.1991. Automatic interpretation of gravity gradiometric data in two dimensions: vertical gradient. Geophysics39, 407434.
    [Google Scholar]
16. MarsonI. & KlingeleE.E.1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3‐D interpretation. Geophysics58, 15881595.
    [Google Scholar]
17. NandiB.K., ShawR.K., AgarwalB.N.P.1997. Identification of the shape of simple causative sources from gravity data. Geophysical Prospecting45, 513520.
    [Google Scholar]
18. NettletonL.L.1976. Gravity and Magnetics in Oil Prospecting. McGraw‐Hill Book Co.
19. OdegardM.E. & BergJ.W.1965. Gravity interpretation using the Fourier integral. Geophysics30, 424438.
    [Google Scholar]
20. RaoB.S.R. & MurthyI.V.R.1978. Gravity and Magnetic Methods of Geophysical DataProcessing. Arnold‐Heinemann Publishers, India.
21. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MillettA.J., SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 8091.
    [Google Scholar]
22. RoyA.1962. Ambiguity in geophysical interpretation. Geophysics27, 9099.
    [Google Scholar]
23. RoyL., AgarwalB.N.P., ShawR.K.1999. Estimation of shape factor and depth from gravity anomalies due to some simple sources. Geophysical Prospecting47, 4158.
    [Google Scholar]
24. SkeelsD.C.1947. Ambiguity in gravity interpretation. Geophysics12, 4356.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SlackH.A., LynchV.M., LaganL.1967. The geomagnetic gradiometer. Geophysics32, 872877.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SmithR.A.1959. Some depth formulae for local magnetic and gravity anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting7, 5563.
    [Google Scholar]
27. StavrevP.Y.1997. Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transforms of gravity or magnetic anomalies. Geophysical Prospecting45, 207246.
    [Google Scholar]
28. TalwaniM., WorzelJ., LandismanM.1959. Rapid gravity computations for two dimensional bodies with application to the Mendocino submarine fracture zones. Journal of Geophysical Research64, 4449.
    [Google Scholar]
29. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: a new technique for making computer‐assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47, 3137.
    [Google Scholar]