Controlled sources for shear‐wave surveys in mines [Link]

References

1. AkiK. & RichardsP.G.1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, Vol. 1. W.H. Freeman.
2. AlfordR.M.1986. Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy: Dilley, Texas. 56th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 476479.
3. BoothD.C., CrampinS., LovellJ.H., ChiuJ.‐M.1990. Temporal changes in shear‐wave splitting during an earthquake swarm in Arkansas. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 11 15111 164.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CarlsonS.R. & YoungR.P.1993. Acoustic emission and ultrasonic velocity study of excavation‐induced microcrack damage at the Underground Research Laboratory. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science and Geomechanical Abstracts30, 901907.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChenT.‐C., BoothD.C., CrampinS.1987. Shear‐wave polarizations near the North Anatolian Fault — III. Observations of temporal changes. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society91, 287311.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CrampinS., BushI., NavilleC., TaylorD.B.1986. Estimating the internal structure of reservoirs with shear‐wave VSPs. Leading Edge5 (11), 3539.
   [Google Scholar]
7. GajewskiD.1993. Radiation from point sources in general anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International113, 299317.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GledhillK.R.1993 a. Shear waves recorded on close‐spaced seismograms I: Shear‐wave splitting results. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics29, 285298.
   [Google Scholar]
9. GledhillK.R.1993 b. Shear waves recorded on close‐spaced seismograms II: The complex anisotropic structure of the Wellington Peninsula, New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics29, 299314.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GrahamG., CrampinS., FernandezL.M.1991. Observations of shear‐wave polarizations from rockbursts in a South African gold field: an analysis of acceleration and velocity recordings. Geophysical Journal International107, 661672.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HolmesG.M., CrampinS., YoungR.P.1993. Preliminary analysis of shear‐wave splitting in granite at the Underground Research Laboratory, Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics29, 140152.
    [Google Scholar]
12. HolmesG.M., CrampinS., YoungR.P.2000. Seismic anisotropy in granite at the Underground Research Laboratory, Manitoba. Geophysical Prospecting48, 415435.
    [Google Scholar]
13. LiuY., BoothD.C., CrampinS., EvansR., LearyP.1993. Shear‐wave polarizations and possible temporal variations in shear‐wave splitting at Parkfield. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics29, 380390.
    [Google Scholar]
14. MuellerM.C.1991. Prediction of lateral variability in fracture intensity using multicomponent shear‐wave surface seismic as a precursor to horizontal drilling in the Austin Chalk. Geophysical Journal International107, 409415.
    [Google Scholar]
15. QueenJ.H. & RizerW.D.1990. An integrated study of seismic anisotropy and the natural fracture system at the Conoco Borehole Test Facility, Kay County, Oklahoma. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 11 25511 273.
    [Google Scholar]
16. TalebiS. & YoungR.P.1989. In‐situ measurements of P and S wave velocities at the Underground Research Laboratory. Report RP004AECL to Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd.