1887
Volume 57 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Several mechanical and hydraulic limitations hinder the ground‐force energy output of a seismic vibrator at low frequencies. The hydraulic pump flow, pump response time, reaction mass stroke, servo valve stroke, engine horsepower, accumulator size, harmonic distortion and vehicle chassis isolation each play a role in limiting the ground‐force energy output of vibrators. In addition, the peak‐decoupling force – which is defined as the smaller value of either the maximum peak force or the hold‐down weight – also plays a role in limiting ground‐force energy production. A model useful for simulating seismic vibrator dynamics is developed to evaluate the impact of these parameters on the vibrator fundamental force envelope at low frequencies. Model data show that among these factors the reaction mass stroke and the peak‐decoupling force are key parameters for setting the target fundamental force that can be achieved at low frequencies. Formulas are derived to estimate fundamental force, peak force and the reaction mass displacement. These formulas can serve as guidelines for sweep designers who plan to design low frequency sweeps with considerable dwell time in the lower frequency ranges. Test data show that formulas can be used to profile the vibrator envelope at low frequencies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00738.x
2008-10-23
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BaetenG. and ZiolkowskiA.1990. The Vibroseis Source . Elsevier. ISBN 0444888799.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BagainiC.2007. Enhancing the low‐frequency content of vibroseis data with maximum displacement sweeps. 69th EAGE meeting, London , UK , Expanded Abstracts.
  3. BellD.W.1986. Acquisition and utilization broadband signals containing 2–8 Hz reflection energy. 55th SEG meeting, Houston , Texas , USA, Expanded Abstracts, 443–446.
  4. MerrittH.E.1967. Hydraulic Control Systems . John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0471596175.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MougenotD.2005. Pushing toward the low frequencies. World Oil226, 9–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SallasJ.J.1984. Seismic vibrator control and the downgoing P‐wave. Geophysics49, 732–740.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WeiZ.2008. Pushing the vibrator envelope: Extending low and high frequency limits. First Break26, 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00738.x
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00738.x
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error