Interpreting complex, three‐dimensional, near‐surface GPR surveys: an integrated modelling and inversion approach

References

1. BalanisC.A.1989. Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics.John Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BergmannT., RobertssonJ.O.A. and HolligerK.1998. Finite‐difference modelling of electromagnetic wave propagation in dispersive and attenuating media. Geophysics63, 856–867.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BerteroM. and BoccacciP.1998. Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging.Institute of Physics Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CassidyN.J.2001. The application of mathematical modelling in the interpretation of ground penetrating radar data. PhD thesis, Keele University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CassidyN.J.2007. A review of practical numerical modelling methods for the advanced interpretation of ground‐penetrating radar in near‐surface environments. Near Surface Geophysics5, 5–22.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CroccoL., PriscoG., SoldovieriF. and CassidyN.J.2007. Advanced forward modelling and tomographic inversion for leaking water pipes monitoring. IEEE Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR2007), 27–19 June, Naples, Italy, 127–131.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CroccoL., PriscoG., SoldovieiriF. and CassidyN.J.2009. Early‐stage leaking pipes GPR monitoring via microwave tomographic inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 270–277.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CroccoL. and SoldovieriF.2003. A microwave tomographic approach for imaging targets buried in a layered medium. Annals of Geophysics46, 559–572.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CroccoL. and SoldovieriF.2008. From qualitative to quantitative inverse scattering methods for GPR imaging. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 15–19 June, Birmingham, UK, 1–8.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CroccoL., SoldovieriF., MillingtonT.M. and CassidyN.J.2010. Bistatic tomographic GPR imaging for incipient pipeline leakage evaluation. Progress in Electromagnetic Research101, 307–321.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FreelandR.S., MillerM.L., YoderR.E. and KoppenjanS.K.2003. Forensic application of FM‐CW and pulse radar. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics8, 97–103.
    [Google Scholar]
12. H.Jol
    GoodmanD., PiroS., NishimuraY., SchneiderK., HongoH., HigashiN.et al. 2009. In: Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (ed. H.Jol ), pp. 479–508. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hammon IIIW.S., McMechanG.A. and ZengX.2000. Forensic GPR: Finite‐difference simulations for responses from buried human remains. Journal of Applied Geophysics45, 171–186.
    [Google Scholar]
14. HugenschmidtJ. and MastrangeloR.2007. The inspection of large retaining walls using GPR. IEEE Proceedings of the 4th International orkshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR2007), 27–19 June, Naples, Italy, 267–271.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KoppenjanS.K., LeeH., LeeM., StreetonM.L. and OnoS.M.2004. Advanced signal analysis for forensic applications of ground penetrating radar. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 21–24 June, Delft, the Netherlands, 443–446.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LeoneG. and SoldovieriF.2003. Analysis of the distorted Born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: Truncation and uncertainties effects. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing41, 66–74.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MarackH., GolebiowskiT. and Tomecka‐SuchonS.2008. Geotechnical analysis and 4D GPR measurements for the assessment of the risk of sinkholes occurring in a polish mining area. Near Surface Geophysics6, 233–243.
    [Google Scholar]
18. MillingtonT.M. and CassidyN.J.2008. Optimising GPR modelling: A practical, multi‐threaded approach to 3D FDTD numerical modelling. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 15–19 June, Birmingham, UK, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MillingtonT.M. and CassidyN.J.2010. A practical, multi‐threaded approach to 3D, finite‐difference time‐domain modelling of ground‐penetrating radar. Computers in Geoscience (in press).
    [Google Scholar]
20. PringleJ.K., JervisJ., CassellaJ. and CassidyN.J.2008. Time‐lapse geophysical investigations over a simulated urban clandestine grave. Journal of Forensic Sciences53, 1405–1417.
    [Google Scholar]
21. SerenS., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., NeubauerW. and GrohS.2004. Combined high‐resolution magnetics and GPR surveys of the roman town of Flavia Solva. Near Surface Geophysics2, 63–71.
    [Google Scholar]
22. SoldovieriF., HugenschmidtJ., PersicoR. and LeoneG.2007. A linear inverse scattering algorithm for realistic GPR applications. Near Surface Geophysics5, 29–41.
    [Google Scholar]
23. TafloveA. and HagnessS.2005. Computational Electrodynamics – The Finite‐difference Time‐domain Method, 3rd edn. Artech House.
    [Google Scholar]
24. H.Jol
    YarovoyA.2009. Landmine and unexploded ordinance detection and classification with ground penetrating radar. In: Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (ed. H.Jol ), pp. 445–478. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
25. YeeK.S.1966. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equation in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation14, 302–307.
    [Google Scholar]