oa Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany

References

1. ArtsR., EikenO., ChadwickA., ZweigelP., van der MeerL. and ZinsznerB.2004. Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time lapse seismic data. Energy29, 1383–1392.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BachuS.2003. Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change. Environmental Geology44, 277–289.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BatzleM. and WangZ.1992. Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics57, 11, 1396–1408.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BergmannP., YangC, LuthS., JuhlinC. and CosmaC.2011. Time‐lapse processing of 2D seismic profiles with testing of static correction methods at the CO2 injection site Ketzin (Germany). J. Applied Geophysics75, 124–139.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BerrymanJ.G. and MiltonG.W.1991. Exact results for generalized Gassmann's equation in composite porous media with two constituents. Geophysics56, 1950–1960.
   [Google Scholar]
6. A.G.Dore
   ChadwickR.A, ArtsR. and EikenO.2005. 4D seismic quantification of a CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea. In: Petroleum Geology: North‐West Europe and Global Perspectives (ed. A.G.Dore and B.A.Vining ), pp.1385–1399. The Geological Society, London . ISNB 1862391645.
   [Google Scholar]
7. EikenO., BrevikI., ArtsR., LindebergE. and FagervikK.2000. Seismic monitoring of CO2 injected into a marine aquifer. SEG 2000 Expanded Abstracts, Calgary.
8. EllisD.V. and SingerJ.M.2007. Well Logging for Earth Scientists. Springer. ISBN 1402037384.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FörsterA., NordenB., Zinck‐JørgensenK., FrykmanP., KulenkampffJ., SpangenbergE., ErzingerJ., ZimmerM., KoppJ., BormG., JuhlinC., CosmaC. and HurterS.2006. Baseline characterization of CO2SINK geological storage site at Ketzin, Germany. Environmental Geosciences13, 145–160.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CO2SINK Group
    FörsterA., GieseR., JuhlinC., NordenB., SpringerN. and CO2SINK Group . 2009. The Geology of the CO2SINK Site: From Regional Scale to Laboratory Scale. Energy Procedia1, Issue 1, 2087–2094.
    [Google Scholar]
11. FörsterA., SchönerR., FörsterH.‐J., NordenB., BlaschkeA.‐W., LuckertJ., BeutlerG., GauppR. and RhedeD.2010. Reservoir characterization of a CO2 storage aquifer: the Upper Triassic Stuttgart Formation in the Northeast German Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology27(10), 2156–2172.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gassmann, F.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
13. CO2SINK Group
    GieseR., HenningesJ., LüthS., MorozovaD., Schmidt‐HattenbergerC., WürdemannH., ZimmerM., CosmaC., JuhlinC. and CO2SINK Group . 2009. Monitoring at the CO2SINK Site: A Concept Integrating Geophysics, Geochemistry and Microbiology. Energy Procedia1, Issue 1, February 2009, 2251–2259.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gonzalez‐CarballoA., GuyonnetP.‐Y., LevalloisB., VeilleretteA. and DeboiasneR.2006. 4D monitoring in Angola and its impact on reservoir understanding and economics. The Leading Edge1, September 2006, no. 9, 1150–1159.
    [Google Scholar]
15. HillR.1963. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids11, 357–372.
    [Google Scholar]
16. IPCC B.Metz
    IPCC . 2005. In: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. B.Metz , O.Davidson , H.C.de Coninck , M.Loos and L.Meyer ). Cambridge University Press. ISNB 9291691186.
    [Google Scholar]
17. JuhlinC., GieseR., Zinck‐JørgensenK., CosmaC., KazemeiniH., JuhojunttiN., LüthS., NordenB. and FörsterA.2007. 3D baseline seismics at Ketzin, Germany: The CO2SINK project. Geophysics72, 121–132.
    [Google Scholar]
18. KazemeiniH., JuhlinC., Zinck‐JørgensenK. and NordenB.2009. Application of the continuous wavelet transform on seismic data for mapping of channel deposits and gas detection at the CO2SINK site, Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Prospecting57, 111–123.
    [Google Scholar]
19. KazemeiniS.H., JuhlinC. and FomelS.2010. Monitoring CO2 response on surface seismic data; a rock physics and seismic modeling feasibility study at the CO2 sequestration site, Ketzin, Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics71, 109–124.
    [Google Scholar]
20. M.Wilson
    KikutaK., HongoS., TanaseD. and OhsumiT.2004. Field test of CO2 injection in Nagaoka, Japan. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT‐7) Vancouver, Canada, September 5–9, 2004 (ed. M.Wilson , T.Morris , J.Gale and K.Thambimuthu ), pp. 1367–1372. ISNB 008044704.
21. KraghEd. and ChristiePh.2001. Seismic Repeatability, Normalized RMS and Predictability, SEG Expanded Abstracts 2001.
22. Dallimore, S. R.
    KulenkampffJ. and SpangenbergE.2005. Physical properties of cores from the Mallik 5L‐38 production research well under simulated in situ conditions using the Field Laboratory Experimental Core Analysis System (FLECAS). In: Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (ed. Dallimore, S. R. and Collett, T. S. ). Geological Survey of Canada. CD‐ROM.
    [Google Scholar]
23. KummerowJ. and SpangenbergE.2011. Experimental evaluation of the impact of the interactions of CO2‐SO2, brine, and reservoir rock on petrophysical properties: A case study from the Ketzin test site, Germany. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.12(5), 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LumleyD., AdamsD., MeadowsM., ColeS. and ErgasR.2003. 4D seismic pressure‐saturation inversion at Gullfaks Field, Norway. First Break21, 49–56.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MeadowsM.2008. Time‐lapse seismic modeling and inversion of CO2 saturation for storage and enhanced oil recovery. The Leading Edge27, 506–516.
    [Google Scholar]
26. MichaelK., AllinsonG., GolabA., SharmaS. and ShulakovaV.2010. Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers – A review of the experience from existing storage operations. Energy Procedia1, 1973–1980.
    [Google Scholar]
27. MüllerT. M., GurevichB. and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks – A review. Geophysics75, A147–A164, DOI: 10.1190/1.3463417.
    [Google Scholar]
28. NordenB., FörsterA., Vu‐HoangD., MarcelisF., SpringerN. and Le NirI.2010. Lithological and Petrophysical Core‐Log Interpretation in CO2SINK, the European CO2 Onshore Research Storage and Verification Project. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering13(2), 179–192.
    [Google Scholar]
29. PlasekR. E., AdolphR.A., StollerC., WillisD.J., BordonE.E. and PortalM.G.1995. Improved pulsed neutron capture logging with slim carbon‐oxygen tools: Methodology, SPE 30598. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. , Dallas , Texas , 22–25 October.
    [Google Scholar]
30. the CO2SINK Drilling Group
    PrevedelB., WohlgemuthL., HenningesJ., KrügerK., NordenB., FörsterA. and the CO2SINK Drilling Group . 2008. The CO2SINK boreholes for geological storage testing. Scientific Drilling6, 32–37.
    [Google Scholar]
31. RingroseP., AtbiM., MasonD., EspinassousM., MyhrerO., IdingM., MathiesonA. and WrightI.2009. Plume Development Around Well KB‐502 at the In Salah CO2 Storage Site. First Break27, 85–89.
    [Google Scholar]
32. SakuraiS., RamakrishnanT.S., BoydA., MuellerN. and HovorkaS.2005. Monitoring saturation changes for CO2 sequestration: petrophysical support of the Frio brine pilot experiment. 46th Annual Logging Symposium Transactions, Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts , New Orleans , Louisiana .
33. CO2SINK Group
    SchillingF., BormG., WürdemannH., MöllerF., KühnM. and CO2SINK Group . 2009. Status Report on the First European on‐shore CO2 Storage Site at Ketzin (Germany). Energy Procedia1, 2029–2035.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schlumberger
    Schlumberger . 2009. Log Interpretation Charts, Schlumberger, Texas .
    [Google Scholar]
35. WhiteJ. E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40, 224–232.
    [Google Scholar]
36. the CO2SINK Group
    WürdemannH., MoellerF., KühnM., HeidugW., ChristensenN.P., BormG., SchillingF.R. and the CO2SINK Group . 2010. CO2SINK – From Site Characterisation and Risk Assessment to Monitoring and Verification: One Year of Operational Experience with the Field Laboratory for CO2 Storage at Ketzin, Germany. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control4, 938–951.
    [Google Scholar]