1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 62, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 62 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We describe a new laboratory technique for measuring the compressional wave velocity and attenuation of jacketed samples of unconsolidated marine sediments within the acoustic (sonic) frequency range 1–10 kHz and at elevated differential (confining – pore) pressures up to 2.413 MPa (350 psi). The method is particularly well suited to attenuation studies because the large sample length (up to 0.6 m long, diameter 0.069 m) is equivalent to about one wavelength, thus giving representative bulk values for heterogeneous samples. Placing a sediment sample in a water‐filled, thick‐walled, stainless steel Pulse Tube causes the spectrum of a broadband acoustic pulse to be modified into a decaying series of maxima and minima, from which the Stoneley and compressional wave, velocity and attenuation of the sample can be determined. Experiments show that PVC and copper jackets have a negligible effect on the measured values of sediment velocity and attenuation, which are accurate to better than ± 1.5% for velocity and up to ± 5% for attenuation. Pulse Tube velocity and attenuation values for sand and silty‐clay samples agree well with published data for similar sediments, adjusted for pressure, temperature, salinity and frequency using standard equations. Attenuation in sand decreases with pressure to small values below Q−1 = 0.01 (Q greater than 100) for differential pressures over 1.5 MPa, equivalent to sub‐seafloor depths of about 150 m. By contrast, attenuation in silty clay shows little pressure dependence and intermediate Q−1 values between 0.0206–0.0235 (Q = 49–43). The attenuation results fill a notable gap in the grain size range of published data sets. Overall, we show that the Pulse Tube method gives reliable acoustic velocity and attenuation results for typical marine sediments.

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2013 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
2013-10-29
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BiotM.A.1952. Propagation of elastic waves in a cylindrical bore containing fluid. Journal of Applied Physics23, 997–1005.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BriggsK.B.1991. Comparison of measured compressional and shear wave velocity values with predictions from Biot theory. In: Shear waves in marine sediments, (eds J.MHovem , M.D.Richardson and R.D.Stoll ), pp. 121–130. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BuckinghamM.J.2005. Compressional and shear wave properties of marine sediments: Comparisons between theory and data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America117, 137–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ClayC.S. and MedwinH.1977. Acoustic Oceanography. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DubbledayP.S. and CapsR.N.1984. Interpretation of sample wave speed measured in an impedance tube. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America76, 964–967.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. GassmannF.1951. Über die Elastizität poröser Medien. Vierteljahrs‐schrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich96, 1–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GemantA.1940. The measurement of solid friction of jackets. Journal of Applied Physics11, 647–653.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HamiltonE.L.1972. Compressional wave attenuation in marine sediments. Geophysics37, 620–646.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. KayeG.W.C. and LabyT.H.1995. Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants. Longman. 611 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. KinslerL.E. and FreyA.R.1962. Fundamentals of Acoustics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 521 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KolskyH.1956. The propagation of stress waves in viscoelastic solids. Physics Magazine1, 693–710.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LeBlancL.R., PandaS. and SchockS.G.1992. Sonar attenuation modelling for classification of marine sediments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America91, 116–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. RedwoodM.1960. Mechanical Waveguides. Pergamon Press, London, 300 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ShumwayG.1960. Sound speed and absorption studies of marine sediments by a resonance method. Geophysics25, 451–467.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. WangZ.2000. The Gassmann equation revisited: Comparing laboratory data with Gassmann's predictions. In: Seismic and acoustic velocities in reservoir rocks, Vol. 3. Recent Developments, (eds Z.Wang and A.Nur ), pp. 8–23. Geophysics Reprint Series, 19, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 633pp.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. WhiteJ.E.1985. Biot‐Gardner theory of extensional waves in porous rods. Geophysics51, 742–745.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
Loading
A new laboratory technique for determining the compressional wave properties of marine sediments at sonic frequencies and in situ pressures†
Geophysical Prospecting 62, 97 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12079
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Attenuation; Marine sediments; P‐waves; Velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error