1887

Abstract

Summary

Comparison of mapping results of surface of top-Carboniferous deposits - C2–3 top by various methods shows that the received results - behaviour isohypse «-2430 m» - are very close to a configuration, completely merging on northern and southern parties of formed “ledge” of structure. The basic distinction consists in sizes increase by the area of structure. The last is quite explainable influence of extraneous factors: errors of measurements, non-uniformity density data etc. One more acknowledgement is their almost full coincidence to earlier received seismic data of reflection technique.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140898
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boldyreva, V.A., Pasteka, R., Chernov, A.A.
    [2000] Modern Interpretation of Gravity and Magnetic Data for Hydrocarbon Deposits Exploration Extended abstracts book. The 8th International Alpine Gravimetry Colloquium, Leoben, Austria, 3–5 May 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernov, A.A.
    [2004] Effective methods of geological interpretation of gravity and magnetic fields. 32nd International Geological Congress, Florence.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pašteka, R. and Richter, P.
    [2002] A simple approach to regularized gradients calculation in gravimetry and magnetometry. Extended abstracts from EAGE 64th Conference and Exhibition, Firenze, P-118, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pašteka, R. and Seiberl, W.
    [1992] Die Auswertung polreduzierter Magnetfelddaten anhand des totalen Feldgradienten. LHA Geophys., 133–143.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140898
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20140898
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error