1887

Abstract

Summary

Recently computationally efficient rank optimization techniques have been studied extensively to develop a new mathematical tool for the seismic data interpolation. So far, matrix completion problems have been discussed where sources are subsample according to a discrete uniform distribution. In this paper, we studied the effect of two different subsampling techniques on seismic data interpolation using rank-regularized formulations, namely jittered subsampling over uniform random subsampling. The other objective of this paper is to combine the fact of source-receiver reciprocity with the rank-minimization techniques to enhance the accuracy of missing-trace interpolation. We illustrate the advantages of jittered subsampling and reciprocity using a seismic line from Gulf of Suez to obtain high quality results for interpolation, a key application in exploration geophysics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141394
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aravkin, A.Y., Kumar, R., Mansour, H., Recht, B. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2013] A robust svd-free approach to matrix completion, with applications to interpolation of large scale data.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aravkin, A., Burke, J. and Friedlander, M.
    [2012] Variational properties of value functions. submitted to SIAM J. Opt., arXiv:1211.3724.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, E.v. and Friedlander, M.P.
    [2008] Probing the pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(2), 890–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fenati, D. and Rocca, F.
    [1984] Seismic reciprocity field tests from the italian peninsula. GEOPHYSICS, 49(10), 1690–1700, doi:10.1190/1.1441576.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441576 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hennenfent, G. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2008] Simply denoise: wavefield reconstruction via jittered undersampling. Geophysics, 73(3), V19–V28.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrmann, F.J. and Hennenfent, G.
    [2008] Non-parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames. Geophysical Journal International, 173(1), 233–248, ISSN 1365-246X.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson, J.
    [2013] Seismic wavefield reconstruction using reciprocity, master thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kreimer, N. and Sacchi, M.
    [2012] Tensor completion via nuclear norm minimization for 5D seismic data reconstruction, chap. 642. 1–5, doi:10.1190/segam2012‑0529.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0529.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar, R., Aravkin, A.Y., Mansour, H., Recht, B. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2013] Seismic data interpolation and denoising using svd-free low-rank matrix factorization. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee, J., Recht, B., Salakhutdinov, R., Srebro, N. and Tropp, J.
    [2010] Practical large-scale optimization for maxnorm regularization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Oropeza, V. and Sacchi, M.
    [2011] Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis. Geophysics, 76(3), V25–V32.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Recht, B., Fazel, M. and Parrilo, P.
    [2010] Guaranteed minimum rank solutions to linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization. SIAM Review, 52(3), 471–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Recht, B. and Ré, C.
    [2011] Parallel stochastic gradient algorithms for large-scale matrix completion. Optimization Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rennie, J.D.M. and Srebro, N.
    [2005] Fast maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative prediction. Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, ICML ’05, ACM, New York, NY, USA, ISBN 1-59593-180-5, 713–719.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacchi, M., Ulrych, T. and Walker, C.
    [1998] Interpolation and extrapolation using a high-resolution discrete fourier transform. Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 46(1), 31–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Silva, C.D. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2013] Hierarchical tucker tensor optimization - applications to 4d seismic data interpolation. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141394
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141394
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error