1887

Abstract

Summary

In stratified reservoir models, crossflow describes how communicating layers of different petrophysical properties allow fluid to pass between them. Viscous crossflow is usually thought to be driven by pressure differentials due to permeability differences between layers, and gravitational crossflow is driven by density differences between phases. In this work, numerical simulations of basic two-dimensional models are presented to demonstrate the effect of gravity-driven crossflow.

Stratified reservoir models are very relevant today, particularly as the importance of offshore carbonate reservoirs grow, with their highly laterally homogenous and vertically cyclical beds with enormous ranges of permeability. Even in reservoirs which are not completely stratified, high-permeability streaks are common, and the crossflow between them and the adjacent low-permeability layers can be vital for maximising the recovery factor.

The results of this investigation serve to demonstrate that gravitational crossflow from high to low permeability layers may not necessarily improve a two-phase displacement sweep, when the low permeability layer is not bound by an impermeable layer beneath. This suggests that, in order to build up physically meaningful analytical models of crossflow during two-phase displacement in stratified reservoirs, a greater understanding of the relative importance of viscous and gravity forces is often required.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141822
2014-09-08
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, G., Castanier, L. and Brigham, W.
    [1988] An experimental study of waterflooding from a two-dimensional layered sand model. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3, 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alhamdan, M.R., Cinar, Y., Suicmez, V.S. and Dindoruk, B.
    [2012] Experimental and numerical study of compositional two-phase displacements in layered porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 98–99, 107–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amy, L.A., Peachey, S.A., Gardiner, A.R., Pickup, G.E., Mackay, E. and Stephen, K.D.
    [2013] Recovery efficiency from a turbidite sheet system: numerical simulation of waterflooding using outcrop-based geological models. Petroleum Geoscience.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckley, S.E. and Leverett, M.C.
    [1942] Mechanism of Fluid Displacement in Sands. Transactions of the AIME, 146, 107–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chaudhari, L., Hadia, N.J., Mitra, S.K. and Vinjamur, M.
    [2011] Flow Visualization of Two-Phase Flow through Layered Porous Media. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 33, 948–958.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Corvi, P., Heffer, K., King, P., Tyson, S., Verly, G., Ehlig-Economides, C., … Hewett, T.
    [1992] Reservoir Characterization Using Expert Knowledge, Data and Statistics. Oilfield Review, 4, 25–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dake, L.P.
    [2001] The Practice of Reservoir Engineering. (Vol. 36)Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dietz, D.
    [1953] A theoretical approach to the problem of encroaching and by-passing edge water. (Vol. 56B, pp. 83–92)Proc, Akad. van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dykstra, H. and Parsons, R.
    [1950] The prediction of oil recovery by waterflood. In Secondary Recovery of Oil in the United States (2nd ed., pp. 160–174)New York: API.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Khatib, N.
    [2012] Waterflooding Performance in Inclined Communicating Stratified Reservoirs. SPE Journal, 17, 31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Khatib, N.A.F.
    [2010] Review of Waterflooding Performance in Stratified Reservoirs. ICIPEG 2010, part of ESTCON 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Godderij, R.R.G.G., Gümrah, F., Palmgren, C.T.S. and Bruining, J.
    [1995] An investigation of the vertical sweep efficiency of steam drive in a layered reservoir. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 84, 261–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Homsy, G.
    [1987] Viscous fingering in porous media. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 19, 311–.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Huppert, H.E., Neufeld, J.A. and Strandkvist, C.
    [2013] The competition between gravity and flow focusing in two-layered porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 720, 14–.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jennings J.Jr., and Ward, W.
    [2000] Geostatistical analysis of permeability data and modeling of fluid-flow effects in carbonate outcrops. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 3, 292–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lake, L.W.
    [1989] Enhanced oil recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pande, K. and OrrF.Jr
    , [1994] Effect of Viscous Crossflow on Miscibility Development in a Two-Layer Flow System: Part I-Ternary Vaporizing Gas Drives. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 2, 7–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rashid, B., Fagbowore, O. and Muggeridge, A.
    [2012] Using Dimensionless Numbers to Assess EOR in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. ECMOR XIII-13th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Riaz, A. and Tchelepi, H.A.
    [2006] Numerical simulation of immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Physics of Fluids, 18, 014104–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shaw-Stewart, J., Wood, R., Van Der Land, C., Corbett, P. and Geiger, S.
    [2013] The Importance of Modelling High Frequency Cycles in Carbonate Reservoirs When Assessing Fluid Flow Performance. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sorbie, K., Sheb, M., Hosseini, A. and Wat, R.
    [1990] Scaled Miscible Floods in Layered Beadpacks Investigating Viscous Crossflow, the Effects of Gravity, and the Dynamics of Viscous Slug Breakdown. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Soucemarianadin, A., Touboul, E., Bourlion, M., Nittmann, J. and Lenormand, R.
    [1987] Sweep efficiency in multilayered porous media: Contrast between stable and unstable flow. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Stiles, W.
    [1949] Use of permeability distribution in water flood calculations. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 186, 9–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wellington, S.L. and Vinegar, H.J.
    [1985] CT Studies of Surfactant-induced CO2 Mobility Control. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yortsos, Y.C.
    [1995] A theoretical analysis of vertical flow equilibrium. Transport in Porous Media, 18, 107–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Yortsos, Y.C. and Hickernell, F.J.
    [1989] Linear Stability of Immiscible Displacement in Porous Media. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 49, 730–748.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yuan, H., Zhang, X., Shapiro, A.A. and Stenby, E.H.
    [2014] Crossflow and Water Banks in Viscous Dominant Regimes of Waterflooding. Petroleum Science and Technology, 32, 1227– 1232.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zapata, V. and Lake, L.
    [1981] A theoretical analysis of viscous crossflow. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, X., Shapiro, A. and Stenby, E.
    [2012] Gravity Effect on Two-Phase Immiscible Flows in Communicating Layered Reservoirs. Transport in Porous Media, 92, 767–788.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141822
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141822
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error