1887

Abstract

Summary

History matching is a challenging optimization problem that involves numerous evaluations of a very expensive objective function through the simulation of complex fluids flows inside an oil reservoir. Typically, the gradient of such a function is not always available. Therefore derivative free optimization methods such as Powell’s NEWUOA are often chosen to try to solve such a problem. One way to reduce the number of evaluations of the objective function is to exploit its specific structure, for example its partial separability. A function F:x->F(x1,…,xp) is said to be partially separable if there exists some subfunctions fi such that F=f1+…+fn and that for all i, fi depends only on pi<p parameters.

In this paper, we study history matching of geostatistics realizations. With an appropriate parameterization by introducing local parameters, one can generally consider the history matching objective function to be partially separable. In fact, if the parameters are localized in space, for example the local gradual deformation parameters or parameters linked to a specific well, we can easily consider that some parameters do not influence certain subfunctions fi which are associated to the wells. We propose in this paper an efficient optimization technique for partially separable functions and show an application of this derivative free optimization method to three cases of oil reservoir. The first one is a simple case constructed to easily identify the partial separability of the objective function while the other two are modified versions of the PUNQ and Brugge cases. Compared to the classic derivative free methods, we were able to significantly reduce the number of objective function evaluations while having a better matching of the production data. Our results confirm the validity of the partial separability assumption on the tested cases and show that our method is well suited to history matching problems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141828
2014-09-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alhuthali, A., Oyerinde, A. and Datta-Gupta, A.
    [2007] Optimal waterflood management using rate control. SPE Saudia Arabia Section Technical Symposium, 10(05), 539–551.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, J., Cuypers, M. and Holden, L.
    [2000] Quantifying uncertainty in production forecasts: Another look at the punq-s3 problem. SPE Journal, 6(4), 433–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conn, A., Scheinberg, K. and Vicente, L.
    [2009] Introduction to derivative free optimization. MPS-SIAM Series on optimization.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dehdari, V. and Oliver, D.
    [2012] Sequential quadratic programming for solving constrained production optimization–case study from brugge field. SPE journal, 17(03), 874–884.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding, D. and McKee, F.
    [2013] Study of perturbation designs for the partially separable objective function with gradient-based optimizations in history matchings. SPE Journal, 18(3), 495–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding, D. and Roggero, F.
    [2010] History matching geostatistical model realizations using a geometrical domain based parameterization technique. Mathematical Geosciences, 42(4), 413–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gervais, V., Gautier, Y., Ravalec, F.L. and Roggero, F.
    [2007] History matching using local gradual deformation. SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jensen, T. and Toft, B.
    [1995] Graph Coloring problems. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Langouët, H.
    [2012] Optimisation sans dérivées sous contraintes. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marteau, B., Ding, D. and Dumas, L.
    [2013] A generalized local gradual deformation method. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the international association for mathematical geosciences, 699–702.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.
    [2006] Numerical optimization. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Peters, E., Chen, Y., Leeuwenburgh, O. and Oliver, D.
    [2012] Extended brugge benchmark case for history matching and water flooding optimization. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 24–.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Peters, E. et al.
    [2010] Results of the brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, the Woodlands, Texas, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ravalec, M.L., Noetinger, B. and Hu, L.
    [2000] The fft moving average (fft-ma) generator: An efficient numerical method for generating and conditioning gaussian simulations. Mathematical Geology, 32(6), 701–723.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Roggero, F. and Hu, L.Y.
    [1998] Gradual deformation of continuous geostatistical models for history matching. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Scheinberg, K. and Toint, P.
    [2010] Self-correcting geometry in model-based algorithms for derivative-free unconstrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20(6), 3512–3532.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Spellucci, P.
    [1998] An sqp method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained subproblems. Mathematical programming, 82(3), 413–448, ISSN 0025-5610, doi:10.1007/BF01580078.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580078 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, C., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.
    [2009] production optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. SPE journal, 14(03), 506–523.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, H., Chen, C., Do, S., Li, G. and Reynolds, A.
    [2011] Maximization of a dynamic quadratic interpolationmodel for production optimization. SPE International.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao, H., Li, G., Reynolds, A. and Yao, J.
    [2013] Large-scale history matching with quadratic interpolation models. Computational geosciences, 17(1), 117–138.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141828
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141828
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error