1887

Abstract

Summary

Predicting fractures in rocks is one of the most important issues in reservoir engineering for enhancing oil and gas production from low permeable reservoirs and unconventional formations. This work discusses a theoretical framework for predicting fractures through time and space during a stimulation hydraulic fracturing test in anisotropic medium. Special attention focuses on transverse isotropic medium. It applies the poroelastic theory coupled to the Mohr-Coulomb and Griffith failure theory for predicting the fractures orientation against distance from the injection well. A dimensionless failure criterion written in matrix form including principal stresses tensor and elastic rock properties is proposed. It includes the Mohr-Coulomb, Griffith, fractures reactivation and hydraulic fracturing. This formulation is used together with a generalized Hubbert-Willis formula to estimate the critical fracking pressure to be applied at the well head. Analytical expressions are given to predict the propagation of the fracking front through time and space apart from the stimulation well. This formulation, implemented in the Gocad geo-modeler workflow, is applied on a synthetic reservoir case-study to illustrate the concept and discuss the advantages and limitations of the suggested approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141885
2014-09-08
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adachi, J., Siebrits, E., Peirce, A. and Desroches, J.
    [2007] Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 44, 757–.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bredehoeft, J., Wolff, R., Keys, W. and Shuter, E.
    [1976] Hydraulic Fracturing to Determine the Regional In-situ Stress Field, Piceance Basin, Colorado. Geol. Soc. America Bull., 87, 258–.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner, S.L. and Gudmundsson, A.
    [2002] Permeability development during hydrofracture propagation in layered reservoirs. NGU-BULL, 439, 77–.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Y.
    [2012] Mechanical Interaction of Multiple Fractures - Exploring Impacts of the Selection of the Spacing/ Number of Perforation Clusters on Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells. SPE Journal, 992–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cosgrove, J.W.
    [2001] Hydraulic fracturing during the formation and deformation of a basin: A factor in the dewatering of low-permeability sediments. AAPG Bulletin, 85(4), 737–748.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cosson, C. and Chaumont, A.
    [2013] Shale gas and hydraulic fracturing: Gocad Wizard manual. ENSG-Nancy, France, master report M1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duncan, J. and Wright, S.G.
    [2005] Soil Strength and Slope Stability. Wiley, New York, 298p.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu, P., Johnson, S.M., Hao, Y. and Carrigan, C.R.
    [2011] Fully coupled geomechanics and discrete flow network modeling of hydraulic fracturing for geothermal applications. Proc., 36th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, SGP-TR-191, Stanford University, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gu, H., Weng, X., Lund, J., Mack, M., Ganguly, U. and Suarez-Rivea, R.
    [2012] Hydraulic Fracture Crossing Natural Fracture at Nonorthogonal Angles: A Criterion and its Validation. SPE Production & Operations, 27(1), 20–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, J. and Garagash, M.
    [2010] Plane-Strain Propagation of a Fluid-Driven Crack in a Permeable Rock with Fracture Toughness. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 136(9), 1152–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hubbert, M. K. and Willis, D.G.
    [1957] Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing. Trans. AIME, 210, 166–.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jowett, E.
    [1992] Role of organics and methane in sulfide ore formation, exemplified by Kupferschiefer Cu-Ag deposits, Poland. Chemical Geology, 99, 63–.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kehle, R.O.
    [1964] The Determination of Tectonic Stresses Through Analysis of Hydraulic Well Fracturing. J. Geophys. Res., 69(11), 259–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kitterod, N.
    [2004] Dupuit-forchheimer solutions for radial flow with linearly varying hydraulic conductivity or thickness of aquifer. Water Resources Research, 40, 5–.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Macé, L., Muron, P. and Mallet, J.L.
    [2005] Integration of Fracture Data into 3D Geomechanical Modeling to Enhance Fractured Reservoirs Characterization. SPE Annual Conf. Exhib., Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., 9p.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J.
    [1998] The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis in porous media. Cambridge Univ. Press, 330.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Molenaar, M., Hill, D., Webster, P., Fidan, E. and Birch, B.
    [2012] First Downhole Application of Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Hydraulic-Fracturing Monitoring and Diagnostics. SPE Drilling & Completion, 27(1), 32–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Paterson, M.S. and Wong, T.
    [2005] Experimental Rock Deformation - The Brittle Field. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, 335.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Peng, J., Rong, G., Cai, M., Wang, X. and Zhou, C.
    [2014] An Empirical Failure Criterion for Intact Rocks. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 47, 356–.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramsey, J.M. and Chester, F.M.
    [2004] Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture. Nature, 428(4), 63–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Royer, J.J.
    [2012] Hydraulic fracturing in homogeneous media. 32th Gocad Meeting, Nancy, France, 20.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. [2013] Hydraulic Fracturing in Transverse Isotropic Media. 33th Gocad Meeting, Nancy, France, 49.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schopfer, M.P.J., Childs, C. and Walsh, J.
    [2009] Two-Dimensional District Element Method (DEM) modeling of tectonic faul growth in mechanically layered sequences. D.Kolymbas and G.Viggiani, (eds), Mechanics of Natural Solids, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 127–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sédov, L.
    [1973] Mécanique des Milieux Continus. Tome I. Editions MIR, Moscou, 540.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sibson, R.H.
    [2004] Controls on maximum fluid overpressure defining conditions for mesozonal mineralisation. Journal of Structural Geology, 26, 1136–.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ván, P. and Vásárhelyi, B.
    [2001] Second law of thermodynamics and the failure of rock materials. In DC Rocks 2001, 38th U.S. Symp. on Rock Mech. (USRMS), Washington D.C., American Rock Mech. Ass., 10p.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, Y. and Economides, M.
    [2005] Transverse Hydraulic Fractures from a Horizontal Well. InSPE Annual Tech. Conf. and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, SPE paper # 94671.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Williams-Stroud, S.C., Barker, W.B. and Smith, K.L.
    [2012] Modelling the response of natural fracture networks to induced hydraulic fractures in stimulation treatments. EAGE First break, 30, 75–.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yu, M.
    [2002] Advances in strength theories for materials under complex stress state in the 20th century. American Soc. of Mech. Eng., ASME, Appl. Mech. Rev., 55(3), 169–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zoback, M.
    [2014] Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 10th (Ed.), 450.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141885
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141885
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error