1887

Abstract

Summary

Locality is inherent to all transient flow and transport phenomena. Moreover, the superposition of the two disparate spatiotemporal scales that underlie flow and transport leads to a problem of dimensionality. Numerous Adaptive discretization methods have been devised to exploit an a priori understanding of locality. While such methods have provided various degrees of success, they are fundamentally restricted by the fidelity of the discretization under aggressive adaptivity. This work seeks a novel class of nonlinear solvers which are proposed to adapt the level of computation to precisely match that of the underlying spatiotemporal change, without affecting the underlying discretization model. We devise a class of nonlinear iteration that on the one hand, converges as rapidly as the best available safeguarding method (e. g. trust-region), while on the other, performing a number of operations that is at most equal to the number of cells that experience changes over an iteration.

We achieve this by developing an Asynchronous Multirate numerical integration of the Newton Flow differential system. At each nonlinear iteration, the domain of interest is partitioned adaptively in two or more levels of disjoint subdomains on the basis of the predicted rate of change of state variables. On one extreme, there are only two levels of partitions; cells that will experience a nonzero change, and cells will not. This two-level solver is equivalent to the adaptively localized solution of the linear Jacobian system. On the other extreme, the domain is decomposed into multiple disjoint subdomains. Under this scheme, the subdomains are solved sequentially using a dynamic partitioning strategy in the order from fastest to slowest. We present detailed computational results focused on general multiphase flow models. The performance improvement directly depends on the extent of locality present in the model. On the two-level end of the spectrum, the convergence rate of the proposed method is unadulterated while the performance is improved by an order of magnitude in computational time.

On the multilevel end of the spectrum, while additional performance gains are obtained for transport components, the convergence rate for pressure requires more costly synchronization strategies. This method looks very promising for the simulation of extremely complex models where well controls change dynamically.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141774
2014-09-08
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allgower, E., Böhmer, K., Potra, F. and Rheinboldt, W.
    [1986] A mesh-independence principle for operator equations and their discretizations. Society of Industrial Applied Mathematics Journal on Numerical Analysis, 23(1), 160–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aziz, K. and Settari, A.
    [1979] Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Elsevier Applied Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Babuvška, I. and Rheinboldt, W.
    [1978] Error estimates for adaptive finite element computations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 15(4), 736–754.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, J., Berger, M., Saltzman, J. and Welcome, M.
    [1994] Three-dimensional adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 15(1), 127–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger, M. and Colella, P.
    [1989] Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of computational Physics, 82(1), 64–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, M. and LeVeque, R.
    [1998] Adaptive mesh refinement using wave-propagation algorithms for hyperbolic systems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 35(6), 2298–2316.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Z., Huan, G. and Ma, Y.
    [2006] Computational Methods for Multiphase Flows in Porous Media. Computational Science and Engineering, Society of Industrial Applied Mathematics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Datta-Gupta, A., Xie, J., Gupta, N., King, M. and Lee, W.
    [2011] Radius of investigation and its generalization to unconventional reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(7), 52–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deuflhard, P.
    [2011] Newton methods for nonlinear problems: affine invariance and adaptive algorithms, vol. 35. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunter, G., Jeffers, S. and Vigier, J.
    [1998] Causality and locality in modern physics. Causality and Locality in Modern Physics, vol. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelley, C. and Sachs, E.
    [1991] Mesh independence of newton-like methods for infinite dimensional problems. Journal of Integral Equations and Applications, 3(4), 549–573.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuchuk, F.
    [2009] Radius of investigation for reserve estimation from pressure transient well tests. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wheeler, M.
    [1973] A priori 1_2 error estimates for galerkin approximations to parabolic partial differential equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 10(4), 723–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Younis, R.
    [2013] A sharp analytical bound on the spatiotemporal locality in general two-phase flow and transport phenomena. Procedia Computer Science, 18, 473–480.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Younis, R., Tchelepi, H. and Aziz, K.
    [2010] Adaptively localized continuation-newton method- nonlinear solvers that converge all the time. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 15(2), 526–544.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141774
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141774
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error