1887
Volume 63 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Eagle Ford Shale of Central and South Texas is currently of great interest for oil and gas exploration and production. Laboratory studies show that the Eagle Ford Shale is anisotropic, with a correlation between anisotropy and total organic carbon. Organic materials are usually more compliant than other minerals present in organic‐rich shales, and their shapes and distribution are usually anisotropic. This makes organic materials an important source of anisotropy in organic‐rich shales. Neglecting shale anisotropy may lead to incorrect estimates of rock and fluid properties derived from inversion of amplitude versus offset seismic data. Organic materials have a significant effect on the PP and PS reflection amplitudes from the Austin Chalk/Upper Eagle Ford interface, the Upper Eagle Ford/Lower Eagle Ford interface, and the Lower Eagle Ford/Buda Limestone interface. The higher kerogen content of the Lower Eagle Ford compared with that of the Upper Eagle Ford leads to a negative PP reflection amplitude that dims with offset, whereas the PS reflection coefficient increases in magnitude with increasing offset. The PP and PS reflection coefficients at the Austin Chalk/Upper Eagle Ford interface, the Upper Eagle Ford/Lower Eagle Ford interface, and the Lower Eagle Ford/Buda Limestone interface all increase in magnitude with increasing volume fraction of kerogen.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12153
2014-09-09
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BackusG.E.1962. Long‐wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research67, 4427–4440.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BerrymanJ.G.1995. Mixture theories for rock properties. In: Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants (ed T.J.Ahrens ), pp. 205–228. AGU, Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BertsekasD.P. and TsitsiklisJ.N.2002. The bivariate normal distribution. In: Introduction to Probability, 1st edition, pp. 247–253, Athena Scientific.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CarmichaelR.S.1989. Practical Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks and Minerals. CRC Press, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CondonS.M. and DymanT.S.2006. 2003 geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in the Upper Cretaceous Navarro and Taylor Groups, Western Gulf Province, Texas. Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas, Navarro and Taylor Groups, Western Gulf Province, Texas. US Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS‐69‐H, Reston, Virginia.
  6. ErwemiA., WalshJ., BennettL., WoerpelC. and PurcellD.2010. Anisotropic velocity modeling for microseismic processing: Part 3—borehole sonic calibration case. 80th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 508–512.
  7. HarborR.2011. Facies characterization and stratigraphic architecture of organic‐rich mudrocks, Upper Cretaceous Eagle Ford Formation, South Texas. Master's thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. 195 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HashinZ. and ShtrikmanS.1963. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids11, 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KellyS., BaltenspergerP. and McMechanG.A.1997. P‐to‐S conversion for a thin anisotropic zone produced by vertical fracturing. Geophysical Prospecting45, 551–570.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KennettB.L.N.1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LockB.E., PeschierL. and WhitcombN.2010. The Eagle Ford (Boquillas Formation) of Val Verde County, Texas—A window on the South Texas play. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions60, 419–434.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MallickS. and FrazerL.N.1990. Computation of synthetic seismograms for stratified azimuthally anisotropic media. Journal of Geophysical Research95, 8513–8526.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MallickS. and FrazerL.N.1991. Reflection/transmission coefficients and azimuthal anisotropy in marine seismic studies. Geophysical Journal International105, 241–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NyeJ.F.1985. Physical Properties of Crystals. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PeselnickL. and RobieR.A.1963. Elastic Constants of Calcite. Journal of Applied Physics34, 2494–2495.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ponte CastanedaP. and WillisJ.R.1995. The effect of spatial distribution on the effective behaviour of composite materials and cracked media. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids43, 1919–1951.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SayersC.M.2008. The effect of low‐aspect‐ratio pores on the seismic anisotropy of shales. 78th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2750–2754.
  18. SayersC.M.2013. The effect of kerogen on the elastic anisotropy of organic‐rich shales. Geophysics78, D65–D74.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SayersC.M. and KachanovM.1991. A simple technique for finding effective elastic constants of cracked solids for arbitrary crack orientation statistics. International Journal of Solids and Structures12, 81–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SchoenbergM. and ProtazioJ.1992. Zoeppritz rationalized and generalized to anisotropy. Journal of Seismic Exploration1, 125–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SevostianovI., YilmazN., KushchV. and LevinV.2005. Effective elastic properties of matrix composites with transversely‐isotropic phases. International Journal of Solids and Structures42, 455–476.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SondergeldC.H., RaiC.S., MargessonR.W. and WhiddenK.2000. Ultrasonic measurement of anisotropy in the Kimmeridge shale. 69th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1858–1861.
  23. SondergeldC.H. and RaiC.S.2011. Elastic anisotropy of shales. The Leading Edge30, 3, 324–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SondhiN.2011. Petrophysical characterization of the Eagle Ford Shale. Master's thesis, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. pp. 197.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SoneH.2012. Mechanical properties of shale gas reservoir rocks and its relation to the in‐situ stress variation observed in shale gas reservoirs. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TianY., AyersW.B. and McCainW.D.2012. Regional analysis of stratigraphy, reservoir characteristics, and fluid phases in the Eagle Ford Shale, South Texas. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions62, 471–483.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TosayaC.A.1982. Acoustic properties of clay‐bearing rocks. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. VanorioT., PrasadM. and NurA.2003. Elastic properties of dry clay mineral aggregates, suspensions and sandstones. Geophysical Journal International155, 319–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. VernikL.1993. Microcrack‐induced versus intrinsic elastic anisotropy in mature HC‐source shales. Geophysics58, 1703–1706.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. VernikL.1994. Hydrocarbon‐generation‐induced microcracking of source rocks. Geophysics59, 555–563.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. VernikL. and LandisC.1996. Elastic anisotropy of source rocks: Implications for hydrocarbon generation and primary migration. AAPG Bulletin80, 531–544.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. VernikL. and LiuX.1997. Velocity anisotropy in shales: A petrophysical study. Geophysics62, 521–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. VernikL. and NurA.1992. Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks. Geophysics57, 727–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. WillisJ.R.1977. Bounds and self‐consistent estimates for the overall moduli of anisotropic composites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids25, 185–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WillisJ.R.1978. Variational principles and bounds for the overall properties of composites. In: Continuum Models for Discrete Systems (ed J.W.Provan ), pp. 185–215. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12153
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12153
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error