1887

Abstract

Summary

In quartzose sandstones with low thermal maturities, porosity evolution during burial is controlled primarily by effective stress (compaction). Many workflows assume that the effective stress may be approximated by the vertical effective stress (VES). This simplification is not appropriate in compressive (SH > Sh ≥ SV) or strike-slip (SH > SV ≥ Sh) regimes where horizontal stress components are equal to, or exceed, the vertical stress. Despite abundant published field evidence, many explorationists continue to underestimate sediment compaction in compressive regimes.

In order to illustrate the problem, we:

  1. estimated the magnitudes of the principal stress components using Anderson’s faulting theory,
  2. transformed them into a single parameter - “equivalent mean effective stress (p*)”- using the Modified Cam Clay model.
  3. applied p* in place of VES in the basin and reservoir modeling workflow.
  4. calculated multiple porosity predictions in Touchstone™ for sand samples from NW Borneo assuming realistic compaction parameters and various modified VES histories.

As a rough rule of thumb, rocks near reverse faults experience the highest lateral stress and their porosities are ∼8 % (relative to bulk rock) lower than in normally compacted sediments. Increasing VES 2–3 times in existing modeling tools yields approximately correct porosities in this environment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20143778
2014-10-19
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davis, R.O. and Selvadurai, A.P.S.
    [2005] Plasticity and Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Desai, C.S. and Siriwardane, H.J.
    [1984] Constitutive laws for engineering materials, with emphasis on geologic materials. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Finkbeiner, T., Zoback, M., Flemings, P. and Stump, B.
    [2001] Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, northern Gulf of Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 85(6), 1007–1031.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Henry, P., Jouniaux, L., Screaton, E.J., Hunze, S. and Saffer, D.M.
    [2003] Anisotropy of electrical conductivity record of initial strain at the toe of the Nankai accretionary wedge. J. Geophys. Res., 108(B9), 2407.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Koyi, H.A., Sans, M., Teixell, A., Cotton, J. and Zeyen, H.
    [2004] The Significance of Penetrative Strain in the Restoration of Shortened LayersInsights from Sand Models and the Spanish Pyrenees. In: McClayK.R. (Ed.)Thrust tectonics and hydrocarbon systems. AAPG Memoir, 82, 207–222.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan, J.K. and Karig, D.E.
    [1995a] Décollement processes at the Nankai accretionary margin, southeast Japan: Propagation, deformation, and dewatering. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B8), 15221–15231.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [1995b] Kinematics and a balanced and restored cross-section across the toe of the eastern Nankai accretionary prism. Journal of Structural Geology, 17(1), 31–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Turcotte, L.D. and Schubert, G.
    [2002] Geodynamics. 2nd edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, 456.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20143778
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20143778
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error