1887
Volume 62, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We report novel laboratory measurements of the full electrical resistivity tensor in reservoir analogue quartzose sandstones with clay contents less than 1.5%. We show that clean, homogeneous, visually uniform sandstone samples typically display between 15% and 25% resistivity anisotropy with minimum resistivity normal to the bedding plane. Thin‐section petrography, analysis of fabric anisotropy, and comparison to finite‐element simulations of grain pack compaction show that the observed anisotropy symmetries and magnitudes can be explained by syn‐depositional and post‐depositional compaction processes. Our findings suggest that: electrical resistivity anisotropy is likely to be present in most clastic rocks as a consequence of ballistic deposition and compaction; compaction may be deduced from measurements of electrical anisotropy; and the anisotropy observed at larger scales in well logging and controlled‐source electromagnetic data, with maximum resistivity normal to bedding, is most likely the result of meso‐scale (10−1 m–101 m) periodic layering of electrically dissimilar lithologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12183
2014-10-20
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdlerA. and LionheartW.R.B.2006. Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT. Physiological Measurement27, S25–S42.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AngevineC.L. and TurcotteD.L.1983. Porosity reduction by pressure solution – a theoretical‐model for quartz arenites. Geological Society of America Bulletin94, 1129–1134.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BachrachR.2011. Elastic and resistivity anisotropy of shale during compaction and diagenesis: joint effective medium modeling and field observations. Geophysics76, E175–E186.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BahrK.1997. Electrical anisotropy and conductivity distribution functions of fractal random networks and of the crust: the scale effect of connectivity. Geophysical Journal International130, 649–660.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BarkerR.D. and WorthingtonP.F.1973. The hydrological and electrical anisotropy of the Bunter sandstone of Northwest Lancashire. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology6, 169–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BergF.G.V.D., SandorR.K.J., BerhadS.S. and LooyestijnW.J.1996. Sandwich: Log Evaluation in Laminated Shaly Sands. Society of Petrophysicists & Well Log Analysts.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BerrymanJ.G. and HoverstenG.M.2013. Modelling electrical conductivity for Earth media with macroscopic fluid‐filled fractures. Geophysical Prospecting61, 471–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BotevZ.I., GrotowskiJ.F. and KroeseD.P.2010. Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Annals of Statistics38, 2916–2957.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EllisM.H., SinhaM.C., MinshullT.A., SothcottJ. and BestA.I.2010. An anisotropic model for the electrical resistivity of two‐phase geologic materials. Geophysics75, E161–E170.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GroomR.W. and BaileyR.C.1989. Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three‐dimensional galvanic distortion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth94, 1913–1925.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HartingerA.E., GuardoR., AdlerA. and GagnonH.2009. Real‐time management of faulty electrodes in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering56, 369–377.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HerwangerJ.V., PainC.C., BinleyA., De OliveiraC.R.E. and WorthingtonM.H.2004. Anisotropic resistivity tomography. Geophysical Journal International158, 409–425.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JouniauxL., ZamoraM. and ReuschleT.2006. Electrical Conductivity Evolution of Non‐Saturated Carbonate Rocks During Deformation up to Failure . Geophysical Journal International167, 1017–1026.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KetchamR.A.2005. Three‐dimensional grain fabric measurements using high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography . Journal of Structural Geology27, 1217–1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KickhofelJ.L., MohamideA., JalfinJ., GibsonJ., ThomasP., MinerboG., et al. 2010. Inductive conductivity tensor measurement for flowline or material samples. Review of Scientific Instruments81.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MarketosG. and BoltonM.D.2010. Flat boundaries and their effect on sand testing. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics34, 821–837.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MendelsonK.S. and CohenM.H.1982. The effect of grain anisotropy on the electrical‐properties of sedimentary‐rocks. Geophysics47, 257–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MeyerF.1994. Topographic distance and watershed lines. Signal Processing38, 113–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MiltonG.W.1985. The coherent potential approximation is a realizable effective medium scheme. Communications in Mathematical Physics99, 463–500.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MoranJ. and GianzeroS.1979. Effects of formation anisotropy on resistivity‐logging measurements. Geophysics44, 1266–1286.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MutoJ. and NagahamaH.2004. Dielectric anisotropy and deformation of crustal rocks: physical interaction theory and dielectric mylonites. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors141, 27–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NabawyB.S., RochetteP. and GeraudY.2010. Electric pore fabric of the Nubia sandstones in South Egypt: characterization and modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 183, 681–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. NewmanG.A., CommerM. and CarazzoneJ.J.2010. Imaging CSEM data in the presence of electrical anisotropy. Geophysics75, F51—F61.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. NorthL., BestA.I., SothcottJ. and MacGregorL.2013. Laboratory determination of the full electrical resistivity tensor of heterogeneous carbonate rocks at elevated pressures. Geophysical Prospecting61, 458–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. OdgaardA., KabelJ., van RietbergenB., DalstraM. and HuiskesR.1997. Fabric and elastic principal directions of cancellous bone are closely related. Journal of Biomechanics30, 487–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. PainC.C., HerwangerJ.V., SaundersJ.H., WorthingtonM.H. and de OliveiraC.R.E.2003. Anisotropic resistivity inversion. Inverse Problems19, 1081–1111.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RamananjaonaC. and MacGregorL.2010. 2.5D Inversion of CSEM data in a vertically anisotropic Earth. Journal of Physics: Conference Series255, 012004 (012013 pp.)–012004 (012013 pp.).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SchlumbergerC.1920Étude Sur La Prospection Électrique Du Sous‐Sol. Gauthier‐Villars, Paris, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SchoenJ.H., MollisonR.A. and GeorgiD.T.1999. Macroscopic electrical anisotropy of laminated reservoirs: a tensor resistivity saturation model. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, USA, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  30. TuckG.J. and StaceyF.D.1978. Dielectric anisotropy as a petrofabric indicator. Tectonophysics50, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WatsonG.S.1966. The statistics of orientation data. The Journal of Geology74, 786–797.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. YasuharaH., ElsworthD. and PolakA.2003. A mechanistic model for compaction of granular aggregates moderated by pressure solution. Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth, 108.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ZaafranZ.M.1981. Studying the effect of sandstone anisotropy on the quantitative interpretation of resistivity sounding and logging. SPWLA Transactions, 22nd Annual Logging Symposium.
  34. ZisserN. and NoverG.2009. Anisotropy of permeability and complex resistivity of tight sandstones subjected to hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Applied Geophysics68, 356–70.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12183
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12183
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Compaction; Electrical anisotropy; Porosity; Sandstone

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error