1887

Abstract

Summary

Because of the strong sea surface reflectivity, a marine source generates both a direct wavefield and a ghost wavefield. This corresponds to a blended source array, the blending process being natural. Consequently, deghosting becomes deblending (‘echo-deblending’). We discuss source deghosting by an iterative deblending algorithm that properly includes the angle-dependence of the ghost: it represents a full-wavefield solution.

The method is independent of the complexity of the subsurface: only what happens at and near the surface is relevant. This means that the actual sea state causes the reflection coefficient to become frequency dependent and the water velocity may not be constant due to temporal and spatial variations in the pressure, temperature and salinity. As a consequence, we propose that estimation of the actual ghost model should be part of the echo-deblending algorithm. This is particularly true for source deghosting, where interaction of the source wavefield with the surface may be far from linear.

The proposed echo-deblending algorithm is also applied to the detector deghosting problem. The detector cable may be slanted and shot records may be generated by blended source arrays, the blending being man-made.

Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed echo-deblending algorithm is robust for background noise.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413191
2015-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen, L. and Zhou, H.
    [2013] Low-frequency seismic deghosting. Geophysics, 78, WA15–WA20.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beasley, C.J., Coates, R., Ji, Y. and Perdomo, J.
    [2013] Wave equation receiver deghosting: a provocative example. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 32(1), 4226–4230.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkhout, A.J. and Blacquière, G.
    [2013] Effect of noise in blending and deblending. Geophysics, 78(5), A35–A38, doi:10.1190/geo2013‑0103.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0103.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. [2014] Combining deblending with multi-level source deghosting. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 41–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferber, R. and Beasley, C.J.
    [2014] Simulating ultra-deep-tow marine seismic data for receiver deghosting. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferber, R., Caprioli, P. and West, L.
    [2013] L1 pseudo-vz estimation and deghosting of single-component marine towed-streamer data. Geophysics, 78(2), WA21–WA26.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Letki, L.P. and Spjuth, C.
    [2014] Quantification of wavefield reconstruction quality from multisensor streamer data using a witness streamer experiment. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mayhan, J.D. and Weglein, A.B.
    [2013] First application of green’s theorem-derived source and receiver deghosting on deep-water gulf of mexico synthetic (seam) and field data. Geophysics, 78(2), WA77–WA89.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Orji, O.C., Sollner, W. and Gelius, L.J.
    [2013] Sea Surface Reflection Coefficient Estimation, chap. 10. 51–55, doi:10.1190/segam2013‑0944.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0944.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Soubaras, R.
    [2010] Deghosting by joint deconvolution of a migration and a mirror migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 29(1), 3406–3410.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Walker, C., Monk, D. and Hays, D.
    [2014] Blended source – the future of ocean bottom seismic acquisition. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413191
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413191
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error