1887
Volume 64, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We suggest a new method to determine the piecewise‐continuous vertical distribution of instantaneous velocities within sediment layers, using different order time‐domain effective velocities on their top and bottom points. We demonstrate our method using a synthetic model that consists of different compacted sediment layers characterized by monotonously increasing velocity, combined with hard rock layers, such as salt or basalt, characterized by constant fast velocities, and low velocity layers, such as gas pockets. We first show that, by using only the root‐mean‐square velocities and the corresponding vertical travel times (computed from the original instantaneous velocity in depth) as input for a Dix‐type inversion, many different vertical distributions of the instantaneous velocities can be obtained (inverted). Some geological constraints, such as limiting the values of the inverted vertical velocity gradients, should be applied in order to obtain more geologically plausible velocity profiles. In order to limit the non‐uniqueness of the inverted velocities, additional information should be added. We have derived three different inversion solutions that yield the correct instantaneous velocity, avoiding any geological constraints. The additional data at the interface points contain either the average velocities (or depths) or the fourth‐order average velocities, or both. Practically, average velocities can be obtained from nearby wells, whereas the fourth‐order average velocity can be estimated from the quartic moveout term during velocity analysis. Along with the three different types of input, we consider two types of vertical velocity models within each interval: distribution with a constant velocity gradient and an exponential asymptotically bounded velocity model, which is in particular important for modelling thick layers. It has been shown that, in the case of thin intervals, both models lead to similar results. The method allows us to establish the instantaneous velocities at the top and bottom interfaces, where the velocity profile inside the intervals is given by either the linear or the exponential asymptotically bounded velocity models. Since the velocity parameters of each interval are independently inverted, discontinuities of the instantaneous velocity at the interfaces occur naturally. The improved accuracy of the inverted instantaneous velocities is particularly important for accurate time‐to‐depth conversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12271
2015-09-03
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐ChalabiM.1997. Instantaneous slowness versus depth functions. Geophysics62, 270–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐ChalabiM.2014. Principles of Seismic Velocities and Time‐to‐Depth Conversion. EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CameronM., FomelS. and SethianJ.2007. Seismic velocity estimation from time migration. Inverse Problems23, 1329–1369.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DixC.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20, 68–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DuBoseJ.1988. A technique for stabilizing interval velocities from the Dix equation. Geophysics53, 1241–1243.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HarlanW.1999. Constrained Dix inversion [Online].
  7. KaufmanH.1953. Velocity functions in seismic prospecting. Geophysics18, 289–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KorenZ. and RavveI.2006. Constrained Dix inversion. Geophysics71, R113–R130.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KorenZ. and RavveI.2014. Azimuthally dependent anisotropic velocity model update. Geophysics79, C27–C53.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MuskatM.1937. A note on propagation of seismic waves. Geophysics2(4), 319–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. OldenburgD., LevyS. and StinsonK.1984, Root‐mean‐square velocities and recovery of the acoustic impedance. Geophysics49, 1653–1663.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RavveI. and KorenZ.2006a. Exponential asymptotically bounded velocity model: Part I–Effective models and velocity transformations. Geophysics71, T53–T65.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RavveI. and KorenZ.2006b. Exponential asymptotically bounded velocity model: Part II–Ray tracing. Geophysics71, T67–T85.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. RavveI. and KorenZ.2007. Conic velocity model. Geophysics72, U31–U46.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. RavveI. and KorenZ.2013. Hyperbolic velocity model. International Journal of Geosciences4, 724–745.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. RenJ., LeeS. and MartinezR.2004. Stable estimation of interval parameters for P‐wave pre‐stack imaging in VTI media. 66th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, D047.
  17. RobeinE.2003. Velocities, Time‐Imaging, and Depth‐Imaging in Reflection Seismics: Principles and Methods. EAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SlotnickM.M.1936a. On seismic computations, with applications, Part I. Geophysics1, 9–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SlotnickM.M.1936b. On seismic computations, with applications, Part II. Geophysics1, 299–305.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SlotnickM.M.1959. Lessons in Seismic Computing, a Memorial to the Author. SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ValencianoA., BrownM., GuittonA. and SacchiM.2004. Interval velocity estimation using edge‐preserving regularization. 74th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2431–2434.
  23. ZhangL. and WangY.2003. Interval velocity estimation using edge‐preserving regularization Integrated velocity inversion and an example of its application Interval velocity estimation using edge‐preserving regularization. 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 654–657.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12271
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12271
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Time‐to‐depth conversion; Velocity inversion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error