1887
Volume 64, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We present an automatic method of processing microseismic data acquired at the surface by a star‐like array. The back‐projection approach allows successive determination of the hypocenter position of each event and of its focal mechanisms. One‐component vertical geophone groups and three‐component accelerometers are employed to monitor both P‐ and S‐waves. Hypocenter coordinates are determined in a grid by back‐projection stacking of the short‐time‐average‐to‐long‐time‐average ratio of absolute amplitudes at vertical components and polarization norm derived from horizontal components of the P‐ and S‐waves, respectively. To make the location process more efficient, calculation is started with a coarse grid and zoomed to the optimum hypocenter using an oct‐tree algorithm. The focal mechanism is then determined by stacking the vertical component seismograms corrected for the theoretical P‐wave polarity of the focal mechanism. The mechanism is resolved in the coordinate space of strike, dip, and rake angles. The method is tested on 34 selected events of a dataset of hydraulic fracture monitoring of a shale gas play in North America. It was found that, by including S‐waves, the vertical accuracy of locations improved by a factor of two and is equal to approximately the horizontal location error. A twofold enhancement of horizontal location accuracy is achieved if a denser array of geophone groups is used instead of the sparse array of three‐component seismometers. The determined focal mechanisms are similar to those obtained by other methods applied to the same dataset.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12349
2015-12-20
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology. University Science Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AllenR.1982. Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America72, S225–S242.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AnikievD., ValentaJ., StanekF. and EisnerL.2014. Joint location and source mechanism inversion of microseismic events: benchmarking on seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing. Geophysical Journal International32(5), 59–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ArtmanB., PodlatchikovI. and WittenB.2010. Source location using time‐reverse imaging. Geophysical Prospecting58, 861–873.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChambersK., KendallJ.‐M., Brandsberg‐DahlS. and RuedaJ.2010. Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor activity. Geophysical Prospecting58, 821–830.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DuncanP.M.2005. Is there a future for passive seismic? First Break23.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DuncanP.M. and EisnerL.2010. Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics75(5), 139–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DyerB.C., SchanzU., LadnerF., HäringO. and SpillmanT.2008. Microseismic imaging of a geothermal reservoir stimulation. The Leading Edge27, 856–869.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EisnerL., GeiD., HalloM., OpršalI. and AliM.2013. The peak frequency of direct waves for microseismic events. Geophysics78(6), A45–A49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FischerT.2003. Automatic location of swarm earthquakes from local network data. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica47, 83–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GajewskiD. and TessmerE.2005. Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization. Geophysical Journal International163, 276–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GhartiH.N., OyeV., RothM. and KühnD.2010. Automated microearthquake location using envelope stacking and robust global optimization. Geophysics75, MA27–MA46.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GrigoliF., CescaS., AmorosoO., EmoloA., ZolloA. and DahmT.2014. Automated seismic event location by waveform coherence analysis. Geophysical Journal International196, 1742–1753.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GrigoliF., CescaS., VassalloM. and DahmT.2013. Automated seismic event location by travel‐time stacking: An application to mining induced seismicity. Seismological Research Letters84, 666–677.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KaganY.Y.2005. Simplified algorithms for calculating double‐couple rotation. Geophysical Journal International171, 411–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KaoH. and ShanS.‐J.2004. The source‐scanning Algorithm: mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space. Geophysical Journal International157, 589–594,
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LomaxA.2008. The NonLinLoc software guide, ALomax Scientific, Mouans‐Sartoux, France.
  18. MagotraN., AhmedN. and ChaelE.1987. Seismic event detection and source location using single‐station (three‐component) data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America77, 958–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RentschS., BuskeS., LüthS. and ShapiroS.A.2007. Fast location of seismicity: A migration‐type approach with application to hydraulic‐fracturing data. Geophysics72, 533–540.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RubinsteinJ.L. and BerozaG.C.2007. Full waveform earthquake location: Application to seismic streaks on the Calaveras fault, California. Journal of Geophysical Research112, B05303.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RutledgeJ. and PhillipsW.2003. Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, East Texas. Geophysics68(2), 441–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SchaffD.P., BokelmannG.H.R., EllsworthW.L., ZanzerkiaE., WaldhauserF. and BerozaC.2004. Optimizing Correlation Techniques for Improved Earthquake Location. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94, 705–721.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. StaněkF., EisnerL. and MoserT.J.2014. Stability of source mechanisms inverted from P‐wave amplitude microseismic monitoring data acquired at surface. Geophysical Prospecting62(3), 475–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ThorntonM., MuellerM. and EisnerL.2013. Uncertainty in microseismic monitoring. GeoConvention 2013.
  25. WaldhauserF. and EllsworthW.L.2000. A double‐difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 1353–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. WithersM., AsterR., YoungC., BeirigerJ., HarrisM., MooreS.et al. 1998. A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America88, 95–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  28. ZhaoH.2005. A fast sweeping method for the Eikonal equations. Mathematics of Computation74, 60.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12349
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12349
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error