1887

Abstract

Summary

While the determination of porosity on sandstones is well established, porosities determined on shales are much less straightforward due to limited coring or inadequate pore preservation. Porosity in shale has an important control on many petrophysical, geomechanical and geochemical parameters of shales. Most of the porosity in shales is associated with small pore throat sizes, ranging in diameter from few up to about 100 nm. Pore throat sizes in carbonate or sandstone reservoir rocks are typically determined using mercury injection porosimetry (MIP). It is however well understood that MIP on shales underestimates porosity due to its limited accessibility. It is well known that using different methods for determining shale porosity results in different porosity values which is due to the different accessibility. Nonetheless, porosity is generally used as an absolute, intrinsic parameter without considering the method for determination. To address this issue we compare porosity, specific surface areas and pore volume distributions from fluid invasion and radiation methods on a total of 14 different Opalinus Clay samples recovered from the shaly facies at the Mont Terri underground laboratory in St. Ursanne, Switzerland.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600391
2016-05-02
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bossart, P. and M.Thury
    [2008] Mont Terri Rock Laboratory - Project, Programme 1996 to 2007 and Results. Federal Office of Topology Swisstopo.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amann-Hildenbrand, A., B.M.Krooss, A.Busch, and P.Bertier
    [2015] Laboratory testing procedures for CO2 capillary entry pressures on caprocks, in Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geological Formations, K.F.Gerdes, Editor. 2015, CPL Press and BP. 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertier, P., K.Schweinar, H.Stanjek, A.Ghanizadeh, C.R.Clarkson, A.Busch, N.Kampman, D.Prinz, A.Amann-Hildenbrand, B.M.Krooss, V.Pipich, and Z.Di
    On the use and abuse of N2 physisorption for the characterization of the pore structure of shales. Clays and Clay Minerals, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Radlinski, A.P.
    [2006] Small-Angle Neutron Scattering and the Microstructure of Rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 63(1), 363–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarkson, C.R., N.Solano, R.M.Bustin, A.M.M.Bustin, G.R.L.Chalmers, L.He, Y.B.Melnichenko, A.P.Radlinski, and T.P.Blach
    [2013] Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. Fuel, 103(0), 606–616.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarkson, C.R., M.Freeman, L.He, M.Agamalian, Y.B.Melnichenko, M.Mastalerz, R.M.Bustin, A.P.Radliński, and T.P.Blach
    [2012] Characterization of tight gas reservoir pore structure using USANS/SANS and gas adsorption analysis. Fuel, 95(0), 371–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. King, H.E., A.P.R.Eberle, C.C.Walters, C.E.Kliewer, D.Ertas, and C.Huynh
    [2015] Pore Architecture and Connectivity in Gas Shale. Energy & Fuels, 29(3), 1375–1390.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pearson, F.J., D.Arcos, A.Bath, J.-Y.Boisson, A.M.Fernandez, H.-E.Gäbler, E.Gaucher, A.Gautschi, L.Griffault, P.Hernan, and H.N.Waber
    [2003] Mont Terri Project – Geochemistry of Water in the Opalinus Clay Formation at the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory. Berichte des BWG, Serie Geologie, 5.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600391
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600391
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error