1887

Abstract

Summary

Hydraulic fracture stimulation in shales has revolutionised the North American energy market. However, how oil and gas flows from the impermeable matrix to fractures is still poorly understood. Shales are characterised by horizontally aligned phyllosilicate minerals, which leads to a well-defined directional variation in seismic velocities, or seismic anisotropy. Petrofabric analysis can be used to constrain the intrinsic anisotropy due to this crystal preferred alignment, but the observed seismic anisotropy is often much larger, suggesting more extrinsic mechanisms such as cracks and fractures are at play.

Microearthquakes induced by fracture stimulation provide excellent probes of the in-situ anisotropy through observations of shear wave birefringence or ‘splitting’. The analysis of microseismic data in a number of shale gas settings suggest that the interplay between induced and pre-existing vertical fractures plays a key role in developing fracture networks. However, recent analysis suggests that sub-horizontal and compliant microcracks may play an equally significant role in promoting flow in highly anisotropic shales.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600429
2016-05-02
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baird, A. F., Kendall, J-M., Verdon, J. P., Wuestefeld, A., Noble, T. E., Li, Y., Dutko, M., Fisher, Q. J.
    [2013] Monitoring increases in fracture connectivity during hydraulic stimulations from temporal variations in shear-wave splitting polarization. Geophysical Journal International, 195 (2), 1120–1131.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kendall, J-M., Q. J.Fisher, Q. J., Covey-Crump, S., Maddock, J., Carter, A., Hall, S. A., Wookey, J., Valcke, S. L. A., Casey, M., Lloyd, G. and Ben Ismail, W.
    [2007] Seismic anisotropy as an indicator of reservoir quality in siliciclastic rocks, Structurally Complex Reservoirs, eds. S.Jolley, D.Barr, J.Walsh and R. J.Knipe, Geol. Soc. London – Spec. Pub., 292, 123–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Usher, P. J.
    [2016] Esimating and interpreting anisotropy and attenuation in large microseismic datasets, PhD thesis, University of Bristol, pp. 210.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Verdon, J. P., Kendall, J.-M. and Wuestefeld, A.
    [2009] Imaging fractures and sedimentary fabrics using shear wave splitting measurements made on passive seismic data, Geophys. J. Inter., 179, 1245–1254.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wuestefeld, A., Al-Harrasi, O., Verdon, J. P., Wookey, J. and Kendall, J-M.
    [2010] Strategies for a fully automated passive microseismic anisotropy analysis, Geophys. Prosp., 58, 755–773.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600429
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600429
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error