1887

Abstract

Summary

Extensive studies have confirmed that altering ionic composition of injection water has a big impact on the ultimate oil recovery. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain the positive effects of Smart Water injection, but no single one is universally accepted as the dominant mechanism. Therefore, in the paper, we conduct a three-dimensional reactive transport modelling study to investigate the geochemical processes during seawater flooding altering seawater with different sulphate concentrations injected into a carbonate reservoir which can help the understanding of the possible mechanism behind Smart Water injection. A series of calcite and anhydrite mineral reactions are key in situ chemical reactions in the study. At the early stage, CO2 partitioning from the hydrocarbon phase into the brine causes significant calcite dissolution. This process can be enhanced by increasing sulphate concentration in the injection water. Sulphate concentration in the injection has a significant impact on whether the calcite is continuously dissolved or not after the CO2 front passes. In the modelling cases that include thermal transport, reservoir temperature is cooled by injection water, and thus anhydrite precipitation and calcite dissolution are decreased.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600768
2016-05-30
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Shalabi, E.W., Sepehrnoori, K. and Delshad, M.
    [2014]. Mechanisms behind low salinity water injection in carbonate reservoirs. Fuel121, 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austad, T., Shariatpanahi, S.F., Strand, S., Aksulu, H. and Puntervold, T.
    , [2015] Low Salinity EOR-effects in limestone reservoir cores containing anhydrite: a discussion of the chemical mechanism. Energy Fuels, 29 (11) 6903–6911
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Awolayo, A., Sarma, H. and AlSumaiti, A.
    , [2015] An Experimental Investigation into the Impact of Sulfate Ions in Smart Water to Improve Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs. Transport in Porous Media1–20
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fjelde, I., Asen, S.M., and Omekeh, A.
    , [2012] Low Salinity Water Flooding Experiments and Interpretation by Simulations. Paper SPE 154142, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yousef, A.A. and Ayirala, S.C.
    , [2014] Optimization study of a novel water-ionic technology for smart-waterflooding application in carbonate reservoirs. Oil Gas. Facil.3 (5), 72–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zahid, A., Stenby, E.H. and ShapiroA.A.
    , [2012] Smart Waterflooding (High Sal/Low Sal) in Carbonate Reservoirs. Paper SPE 154508, EAGE Annual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Attar, H.H., Mahmoud, M.Y., Zekri, A.Y, Almehaideb, R. and Ghannam, M.
    , [2013] Low-salinity flooding in a selected carbonate reservoir: experimental approach. J Petroleum. Exploration and Production Technology3(2) 139–149.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600768
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600768
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error