1887

Abstract

Summary

Shale gas resource plays a significant role in energy supply world-widely. As shale has extremely low permeability, it is impossible to obtain economical production without horizontal wellbores and hydraulic fracturing. Additional elements, such as free gas in porous media and absorbed gas in organic matter and multiple scales of pores, further complicate fluid flow in shale formations. Under this scenario, reservoir performance will be affected by many parameters. The objective is to understand the most influencing parameters for shale reservoir performance, in term of long term or short term production rate or cumulative production. To this end, these parameters were classified into two categories: a) reservoir properties and b) hydraulic fracture; the method of experimental design is used to conduct sensitive analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on each parameter and combination of parameters in each category and combination of all parameters. Objective functions were taken using production rate and cumulative production at one year, five years, ten years, and twenty years. Results show that each parameter has a changing role in influencing the reservoir performance, and hydraulic fracture properties have dominating influence for early production, and reservoir properties have increasing influence on the later stage of shale gas production.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601138
2016-05-30
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carlson, E.S. and Mercer, J.C.
    [1991] Devonian Shale Gas Production: Mechanisms and Simple Models. JPT, 476–482. SPE-19311-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cipolla, C.L., Lolon, E.P., Erdle, J.C. and Rubin, B.
    [2010] Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas Reservoirs. SPEREE, August, 638–653. SPE-125530-PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Freeman, C.M.
    [2010]. A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas. SPE-141125-STU.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., Unsworth, M.
    [2007] Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 46(10).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Langmuir, I.
    [1918] The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of The American Chemical Society, 40(9), 1361–1403.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, J., Du, C.M., and Zhang, Xu
    . [2011] Critical Evaluation of Shale Gas Reservoir Simulation Approaches: Single Porosity and Dual-Porosity Modeling. Paper SPE 141756.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Moridis, G.J., Blasingame, T.A. and Freeman, C.M.
    [2010] Analysis of Mechanisms of Flow in Fractured Tight-Gas and Shale-Gas Reservoirs. SPE 139250.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Swami, V., Clarkson, C.R. and Settari, A.
    [2012] Non-Darcy Flow in Shale Nanopores: Do We Have a Final Answer? SPE-162665-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu, Y.-S. and Pruess, K.
    [1988] A Multiple-Porosity Method for Simulation of Naturally Fractured Petroleum Reservoirs.Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/15129‑PA.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/15129-PA [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601138
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601138
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error