1887

Abstract

Summary

The success of de-ghosting depends on accurate estimation of the ghost delay time, explicitly, or implicitly. We propose the use of the L1 norm in searching for the ghost delay time, after dividing data into overlapping windows. The adaptive de-ghosting method has been tested using both synthetic data and field data, including wide azimuth (WAZ) and full azimuth (FAZ) data. Its adaptive nature makes it applicable for data with 3D effects, and robust to uncertainties in receiver depth and water velocity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601582
2016-05-30
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carlson, D.A., Long, W., Tobti., H., Tenghamn, R., and Lunde, N.
    [2007] Increased resolution and penetration from a towed dual-sensor streamer, First Break, 25, 71–77
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Grion, S., Telling, R., and Barnes, J.
    [2015], De-ghosting by kurtosis maximisation in practice, 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4605–4609
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jovanovich, D.B., Sumner, R.D., and Akins-Easterlin, S.L.
    [1983] Ghosting and marine signature deconvolution, a prerequisite for detailed seismic interpretation, Geophysics, 48, 1468–1485
    [Google Scholar]
  4. King, S. and Poole, G.
    [2015] Hydrophone-only receiver de-ghosting using a variable see surface datum, 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4610–4614
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Masoomazadeh, H. and Woodburn, N.
    [2013] Broadband processing of conventional streamer data-optimized de-ghosting in the Tau-P domain, 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporatingSPE EUROPEC, London, UK
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Posthumus, B. J.
    [1993] De-ghosting using a twin streamer configuration, Geophysical Prospecting, 41, 267, 267–286
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Soubaras, R.
    [2012] Pre-stack de-ghosting for variable-depth streamer data, 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporatingSPE EUROPEC, Copenhagen, Denmark, I019
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Telling, R., Riddalls, N., Azmi, A., Grion, S., and Williams, R.
    [2014] Broadband processing of west of Shetland data, First Break, 32, 97–103
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, P., RayS., and NimsailaK.
    [2014] 3D joint de-ghosting and crossline interpolation for marine single-component streamer data, 84th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3594–3598
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou, Z., Cvetkovic, M., Xu, B., and Fontana, P.
    [2012] Analysis of a broadband processing technology applicable to conventional streamer data, First Break, 30, 77–82
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601582
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601582
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error