1887

Abstract

Summary

Harmonic noise in seismic data is a single frequency noise caused by power line within the data acquisition systems and generally filtered by classical notch filter. However, the notch filter would attenuate all recorded data around notch frequency at especially 50 Hz (or 60 Hz) and so leads to loss available information that explains fine details in the seismic data. On the other hand, iterative trimmed and truncated mean filter method locally applied in spectral domain (LITTM) is a signal protector filter and is very effective to remove the harmonic noise in the signal. In this study we proposed to compare the quality of migrated sections after removing the harmonic noise by using classical notch and LITTM filters. We tested the applicability and reliability of the LITTM filter in removing the single frequency harmonic noise on synthetic data set and then applied it to a marine data from Turkey. When comparing the outputs from classical notch and LITTM filters, we found that the LITTM filter strikes a balance between the removing harmonic noise and protecting available frequencies. Our experiments show that the LITTM filter can effectively be used to eliminate other spike-like noise within the bandwidth of the data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602143
2016-09-04
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Butler, K.E. and Russell, R.D.
    [2003] Cancellation of multiple harmonic noise series in geophysical records. Geophysics, 68, 1083–1090.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jiang, X.D.
    [2012] Iterative truncated arithmetic mean filter and its properties. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21, 1537–1547.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Larsen, J.J., Dalgaard, E., Auken, E.
    [2013] Noise cancelling of MRS signals combining model-based removal of powerline harmonics and multichannel Wiener filtering. Geophys. J. Int., 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Linville, F., and Meek, R.A.
    [1992] Cancelling stationary sinusoidal noise. Geophysics, 57, 1493–1501.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miao, Z. and JiangX.
    [2014] Additive and exclusive noise suppression by iterative trimmed and truncated mean algorithm. Signal Processing, 99, 147–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nyman, D.C., and Gaiser, J.E.
    [1983] Adaptive rejection of high-line contamination. 53rd Ann. Internat. Mtg., Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded Abstracts, 1270–1274.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saucier, A., Marchant, M., Chouteau, M.
    [2006] A fast and accurate frequency estimation method for canceling harmonic noise in geophysical records. Geophysics, 71, V7–V18.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Xia, J., and Miller, R.D.
    [2000] Design of a hum filter for suppressing power-line noise in seismic data. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 5, 31–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Karsli, H., Dondurur, D.
    [2015] Spectral domain local cancellation procedure of harmonic noise in seismic data. 8th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 5–8 October 2015, Chania, Greece.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602143
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602143
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error