1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 65, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 65, Issue 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The horizontal transversely isotropic model, with arbitrary symmetry axis orientation, is the simplest effective representative that explains the azimuthal behaviour of seismic data. Estimating the anisotropy parameters of this model is important in reservoir characterisation, specifically in terms of fracture delineation. We propose a travel‐time‐based approach to estimate the anellipticity parameter η and the symmetry axis azimuth ϕ of a horizontal transversely isotropic medium, given an inhomogeneous elliptic background model (which might be obtained from velocity analysis and well velocities). This is accomplished through a Taylor's series expansion of the travel‐time solution (of the eikonal equation) as a function of parameter η and azimuth angle ϕ. The accuracy of the travel time expansion is enhanced by the use of Shanks transform. This results in an accurate approximation of the solution of the non‐linear eikonal equation and provides a mechanism to scan simultaneously for the best fitting effective parameters η and ϕ, without the need for repetitive modelling of travel times. The analysis of the travel time sensitivity to parameters η and ϕ reveals that travel times are more sensitive to η than to the symmetry axis azimuth ϕ. Thus, η is better constrained from travel times than the azimuth. Moreover, the two‐parameter scan in the homogeneous case shows that errors in the background model affect the estimation of η and ϕ differently. While a gradual increase in errors in the background model leads to increasing errors in η, inaccuracies in ϕ, on the other hand, depend on the background model errors. We also propose a layer‐stripping method valid for a stack of arbitrary oriented symmetry axis horizontal transversely isotropic layers to convert the effective parameters to the interval layer values.

© 2017 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2016 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
2016-10-05
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐DajaniA. and AlkhalifahT.2000. Reflection moveout inversion for horizontal transverse isotropy: accuracy, limitation, and acquisition. Geophysics65(1), 222–231.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐DajaniA. and TsvankinI.1998. Nonhyperbolic reflection moveout for horizontal transverse isotropy. Geophysics63(5), 1738–1753.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AlkhalifahT.1998. Acoustic approximations for processing in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics63, 623–631.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AlkhalifahT.2011a. Scanning anisotropy parameters in complex media. Geophysics76(2), U13–U22.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. AlkhalifahT.2011b. Traveltime approximations for transversely isotropic media with an inhomogeneous background. Geophysics76(3), WA31–WA42.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. AlkhalifahT.2013. Traveltime approximations for inhomogeneous transversely isotropic media with a horizontal symmetry axis. Geophysical Prospecting61, 495–503.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. AlkhalifahT. and TsvankinI.1995. Velocity analysis for transversely isotropic media. Geophysics60, 1550–1566.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000a. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data‐Part I: HTI model due to a single fracture set. Geophysics65(6), 1788–1802.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000b. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data‐Part II: fractured models with orthorhombic symmetry. Geophysics65(6), 1803–1817.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BenderC.M. and OrszagS.A.1978. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw‐Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. DixC.H.1955. Seismic velocities from surface measurements. Geophysics20(1), 68–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GrechkaV., TsvankinI. and CohenJ.K.1999. Generalized dix equation and analytic treatment of normal‐moveout velocity for anisotropic media. Geophysical Prospecting47(2), 117–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KorenZ., RavveI. and LevyR.2010. Moveout approximation for horizontal transversely isotropic layered medium‐Part II: effective model. Geophysical Prospecting58(4), 599–617.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MaX. and AlkhalifahT.2013. qP wave traveltime computation by an iterative approach. 75th EAGE meeting, London, UK, Expanded Abstracts, We 02 09.
  15. MasmoudiN. and AlkhalifahT.2015. Traveltime approximations for inhomogeneous orthorhombic media. 77th EAGE meeting, Madrid, Spain, Expanded Abstracts, Tu N102 15.
  16. MasmoudiN. and AlkhalifahT.2016. Traveltime approximations and parameter estimation for orthorhombic media. Geophysics81(4), C127–C137.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. RugerA.1997. P‐wave reflection coefficients for transversely isotropic models with vertical and horizontal axis of symmetry. Geophysics62(3), 713–722.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. SayersC.M.1994. The elastic anisotrophy of shales. Journal of Geophysical Research99(B1), 767–747.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. SchoenbergM. and HelbigK.1997. Orthorhombic media: modeling elastic wave behavior in a vertically fractured earth. Geophysics62(6), 1954–1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ThomsenL.1988. Reflection seismology over azimuthally anisotropic media. Geophysics53(3), 304–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. TsvankinI.1997. Anisotropic parameters and P‐wave velocity for orthorhombic media. Geophysics62(4), 1292–1309.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WaheedU., YarmanC.E. and FlaggG.2014. An iterative fast sweeping based eikonal solver for tilted orthorhombic media. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 480–485.
  23. WangX. and TsvankinI.2009. Estimation of interval anisotropy parameters using velocity‐independent layer stripping. Geophysics74(5), WB117–WB127.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. WangY., NemethT. and LanganR.T.2006. An expanding‐wavefront method for solving the eikonal equations in general anisotropic media. Geophysics71, T129–T135.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. WildP. and CrampinS.1991. The range of effects of azimuthal isotropy and eda anisotropy in sedimentary basins. Geophysical Journal International107(3), 513–529.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
Loading
Scanning anisotropy parameters in horizontal transversely isotropic media
Geophysical Prospecting 65, 981 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12464
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Azimuth; Eikonal; Traveltimes

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error