1887
Volume 65, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The leading component of the high‐frequency asymptotic description of the wavefield, given by the travel time, is governed by the eikonal equation. In anisotropic media, traveltime measurements from seismic experiments conducted along one surface cannot constrain the long‐wavelength attribute of the medium along the orthogonal‐to‐the‐surface direction, as anisotropy introduces an independent parameter controlling wave propagation in the orthogonal direction. Since travel times measured on the Earth's surface in transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis are mainly insensitive to the absolute value of the anisotropic parameter responsible for relating these observations to depth δ, the travel time was perturbed laterally to investigate the traveltime sensitivity to lateral variations in δ. This formulation can be used to develop inversion strategies for lateral variations in δ in acoustic transversely isotropic media, as the surface‐recorded data are sensitive to it even if the model is described by the normal moveout velocity and horizontal velocity, or the anellipticity parameter η. Numerical tests demonstrate the enhanced sensitivity of our data when the model is parameterised with a lateral change in δ.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12483
2016-12-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlkhalifahT.2000. An acoustic wave equation for anisotropic media. Geophysics65, 1239–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlkhalifahT.2010. Acoustic wavefield evolution as a function of source location perturbation. Geophysical Journal International183, 1324–1331.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AlkhalifahT.2011. Wavefield dependency on virtual shifts in the source location. Geophysical Prospecting59, 627–634.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AlkhalifahT. and FomelS.2010. An eikonal‐based formulation for traveltime perturbation with respect to the source location. Geophysics75, T175–T183.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AlkhalifahT., FomelS. and BiondiB.2001. The space–time domain: theory and modelling for anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal International144, 105–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AlkhalifahT. and TsvankinI.1995. Velocity analysis for transversely isotropic media. Geophysics60, 1550–1566.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AlkhalifahT. and WuZ.2016. Practical waveform inversion in anisotropic media: the natural combination of the data and image objectives. 86th SEG annual international meeting, Dallas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1315–1319.
  8. MaX. and AlkhalifahT.2013. Wavefield extrapolation in pseudodepth domain. Geophysics78, S81–S91.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PodvinP. and LecomteI.1991. Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools. Geophysical Journal International105, 271–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. van TrierJ. and SymesW.W.1991. Upwind finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes. Geophysics56, 812–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VidaleJ.E.1988. Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America6, 2062–2076.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. VidaleJ.E.1990. Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions. Geophysics55, 521–526.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12483
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12483
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Inversion; Travel time

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error