1887

Abstract

Summary

High resolution deconvolution and seismic impedance inversion of seismic reflection data is extremely important in order to describe the geometry and the physical properties of subsurface structures. High resolution deconvolution results are taken as the reflectivity coefficient series of the earth and have broadband spectral information. However, when the noise content of the seismic data is increased, traditional inversion methods such as the least squares and quadratic regularization methods mostly lead to unreliable and low quality results. In addition, estimation of reflectivity from seismic data is generally band-limited and negatively affect impedance inversion. In this study, we used the Cauchy norm deconvolution (CND) method, which is iteratively applied and has high anti-noise ability. This produced high resolution deconvolution and also retrieved accurate seismic impedance results. We tested the performance of the CND method for impedance inversion on synthetic data and we showed that the method provides impedance with higher accuracy and reliability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701187
2017-06-12
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Au Yeung, C.
    (1986). Maximum entropy deconvolution. IEEE International Conference on ICASSP ‘86. (Volume: 11), (pp. 273–276).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Becquey, M., Lavergne, M. and Willm, C.
    , 1979. Acoustic impedance logs computed from seismic traces, Geophysics, 44, 1485–1501.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Esmaelli, S., Margrave, G. F.
    , 2014, Recovering low frequencies for impedance inversion by frequency domain deconvolution, GeoConvention 2014, FOCUS, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Galbraith, J. M. and Millington, G. F.
    , 1978. Low frequency recovery in the inversion of seismograms, C.S.E.G National Convention, Calgary-Canadian.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner, G. H. F., Gardner, W. and Gregory, R.
    , 1974, Formation velocity and density the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps; Geophysics, vol. 39, 770–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Guitton, A. ve Symes, W. W.
    , 2003. Robust inversion of seismic data using the Huber norm, Geophysics, 68, 1310–1319.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Leinbach, J.
    (1995). Wiener spiking deconvolution and minimum-phase wavelets: A tutorial, The Leading Edge, 14(3), 189–192..
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindseth, R. O.
    , 1979. Synthetic sonic logs — a process for stratigraphic interpretation, Geophysics, 44, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, C., Song, C., Qi, L., Liu, Y., Feng, X. and Gao, Y.
    , 2015. Impedance inversion based on L1 norm regularization, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 120, 7–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Oldenburg, D. W., Scheuer, T. and Levy, S.
    , 1983. Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms, Geophysics, 48, 1318–1337.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sacchi, M. D.
    , 1997. Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 651–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schoepp, A. R. and Margrave, G. F.
    , 1998. Improving seismic resolution with nonstationary deconvolution. 68th Annual International Meeting of SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1096–1099.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, Y.
    , 2011. Seismic impedance inversion uisng l1-norm regularization and gradient descent methods, J. Inv. Ill-Posed Problems, 18, 823–833.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, J. and Sacchi, M. D.
    , 2008. Structure-and-Amplitude Preserving Multi-Channel Deconvolution, CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention, Canadian.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701187
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701187
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error