1887

Abstract

Summary

We apply visco-elastic full waveform inversion (FWI) to a 50-km long controlled-source seismic survey at the San Andreas Fault (SAF) to obtain high resolution P-wave and S-wave velocity models. The profile consists of 63 explosive sources and 912 3-component receivers. At the current state of the study, we derived individual source wavelets for the different shots at low frequencies (3–6 Hz).

Several preprocessing steps (time / offset windowing, trace specific weights, 3D-2D-compensation) are evaluated considering the similarity of the derived source signatures. To estimate the seismic data from 2D wave propagation, a 3D-to-2D-compensation function is derived to account for different divergence of P-, S-and their converted phases. Homogeneous velocity models and coinciding wave paths are assumed.

Traveltime models from Ryberg et al. (2012) and Hole et al. (2006) are used to derive velocity starting models. Attenuation is estimated from Qp and Qs t*-tomography models after Bennington et al. (2008). Density is estimated using Gardner’s (1974) relation. The forward modeling is based on a time-domain visco-elastic FD-algorithm of Robertsson et al. (1996). The inversion is performed in the frequency-domain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701495
2017-06-12
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennington, N., Thurber, C. and Roecker, S.
    [2008] Three-Dimensional Seismic Attenuation Structure around the SAFOD Site, Parkfield, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, (6).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardner, G.H.F., Gardner, L.W. and Gregory, A.R.
    [1974] Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basis of stratigraphic traps. Geophysics, 770–780.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hole, J.A., Ryberg, T., Fuis, G., Bleibinhaus, F. and Sharma, A.
    [2006] Structure of the San Andreas fault zone at SAFOD from a seismic refraction survey. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(L07312).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Paschke, M., Krause, M. and Bleibinhaus, F.
    [2015] Determining the source time history in visco-elastic full waveform inversion (FWI). 75th annual meeting of the German Geophysical Society. Abstract SE-5.02.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [2016] Visco-elastic Controlled-source Full Waveform Inversion without Surface Waves. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition. Extended Abstract Tu SRS201.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pratt, R.G.
    [1999] Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics, 64, 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertsson, J.O.A.
    [1996] A numerical free-surface condition for elastic/viscoelastic finite-difference modeling in the presence of topography. Geophysics, 61(6), 1921–1934.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ryberg, T., Hole, J.A., Fuis, G.S., Rymer, M.J., Bleibinhaus, F., Stromeyer, D. and Bauer, K.
    [2012] Tomographic Vp and Vs structure of the California Central Coast Ranges, in the vicinity of SAFOD, from controlled-source seismic data. Geophysical Journal International, 190(3), 1341–1360.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701495
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701495
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error