1887

Abstract

Summary

Recently, the interest in induced polarization (IP) phenomenon in airborne time-domain electromagnetic (ATEM) data has been significantly increased. 2D induced polarization greatly affects the ATEM data and masks underlying geological structures. In order to simulate rigorous 2D airborne IP data, a 2.5D modeling algorithm has been developed using the Cole-Cole model and the finite-element method. We verify our algorithm by comparison with the 1D solution of the AarhusInv code. 2D IP effects in the ATEM data are related to the four Cole-Cole parameters, the horizontal length of the 2D target and the distance between the receiver and the target. Compared to the 1D IP responses, the 2D responses are different especially at the stations near the edge of the 2D target. The general shape of the 2D target except for the edge can be recovered by the 1D Laterally Constrained Inversion (LCI) of AarhusInv.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702152
2017-09-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auken, E. et al.
    . [2015] An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data. Exploration Geophysics, 46, 223–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cole, K. S. and Cole, R. H.
    [1942] Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics. Journal of Chemical Physics, 9, 341–351.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiandaca, G., Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V. and Gazoty, A.
    [2012] Time-domain-induced polarization: Full-decay forward modeling and 1D laterally constrained inversion of Cole-Cole parameters. Geophysics, 77(3), E213—E225.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaminski, V. and Viezzoli, A.
    [2016] Modeling IP effects in TEM data: Field case studies. Geophysics, 82(2), B49–B61.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, S. and Oldenburg, D. W.
    [2015] Recovering IP information in airborne-time domain electromagnetic data. 24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Extended Abstracts, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kratzer, T. and Macnae, J.
    [2012] Induced polarization in airborne EM. Geophysics, 77(5), E317–E327.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Macnae, J.
    [2016] Quantifying airborne induced polarization effects in helicopter time domain electromagnetics. Journal of Applied geophysics, 135, 495–502.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marchant, D., Haber, E. and OldenburgD.
    [2012] Induced polarization in airborne EM. Geophysics, 79(6), E303–E314.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pelton, S., Ward, H., Hallof, P. G., Sill, W. R. and Nelson, P. H.
    [1978] Mineral discrimination and removal of inductive coupling with multifrequency IP. Geophysics, 43, 588–609.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Raiche, A.
    [1998] Modeling the time-domain response of AEM systems. Exploration Geophysics, 29, 103–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Viezzoli, A., Fiandaca, G. and Sergio, S.
    [2013] Study on the potential of recovering IP parameters from Airborne TEM data in layered geology. 6th International AEM Conference and Exhibition, SAGA, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Viezzoli, A., Kaminski, V. and Fiandaca, G.
    [2016] Modeling induced polarization effects in helicopter time domain electromagnetic data: Synthetic case studies. Geophysics, 82(2), E31–E50.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ward, S. H. and Hohmann, G. W.
    [1988] Geophysical electromagnetic theory. Electromagnetic Method in Applied Geophysics, Vol 1, Theory, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702152
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702152
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error