1887

Abstract

Summary

Engineering bedrock depth models plays crucial role estimating the site effects since a damaging earthquake hits the regions prone to seismically active areas. Sediments thickness is one of the important parameters in seismic hazard assessment. Seismic station’s bedrock depths and ground response also have importance in earthquake hazard studies and site classification schemes. Within this context, engineering bedrock depths were estimated for four installed stations in Kocaeli basin and its vicinity and compared with the borehole data. It was carried out active and passive seismic methods (MASW and H/V) to determine shear wave velocity and resonant frequencies and v0 for the velocity depth function. In this regard velocity-depth functions were used and bedrock depths were estimated for per station between the range of 50 and 200 meters. Most of the results show a good compatibility with the borehole data. Subsequently transfer functions were calculated for uniform, damped soil on rigid rock model. Besides, Obtained parameters put these information into service to establish better seismic hazard assessments and will be useful for hybrid classification schemes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702575
2017-11-05
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albarello, D.; Cakir, R.; Walsh, T.J.
    , 2011a, Single station Ambient Vibration Measurements in the Puget Lowland and Coastal Area, Washington: DNR-DGER internal report.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Building Seismic Safety Council
    Building Seismic Safety Council (2003). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures and Accompanying Commentary and Maps, FEMA450, Chapter 3, pp. 17–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. IbsVon Seht M.; WohlembergJ.
    , 1999, Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments: Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 250–259
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kramer, Steven L.
    Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Prentice Hall.” New York (1996).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Livaoglu, H., Irmak, T. S., Güven, I. T., & Ozer, M. F.
    (2015, April). An Empiric Relationship between Sediment Thickness of Different data and Resonance Frequency which Calculated by Using the H/V Ratio Method of Seismic Noise for Gölcük-Degirmendere Area (Turkey). In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 17).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. NakamuraY.
    , 1989, A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface: Quaterly Report Railway Tech. Res. Inst., 30-1, 25–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Parolai, S., P.Bormann, and C.Milkereit
    . “New relationships between Vs, thickness of sediments, and resonance frequency calculated by the H/V ratio of seismic noise for the Cologne area (Germany).” Bulletin of the seismological society of America92.6(2002): 2521–2527.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Şengör, A. M. C.,et al.
    “The North Anatolian fault: A new look.” Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.33 (2005): 37–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Özalaybey, S., Zor, E., Ergintav, S., & Tapirdamaz, M. C.
    (2011). Investigation of 3-D basin structures in the Izmit Bay area (Turkey) by single-station microtremor and gravimetric methods. Geophysical Journal International, 186(2), 883–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. XiaJ; MillerRD; ParkCB
    ; 1999, estimation of near surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves: Geophysics, 64(3), 691–700.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702575
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702575
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error