Three‐dimensional reconstruction of a masonry building through electrical and seismic tomography validated by biological analyses

References

1. AdamJ.P.2005. Roman Building: Materials and Techniques.London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 368 pp.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AdlerA. and LionheartW.R.2006. Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT. Physiological Measurement27, S25.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CardarelliE., CercatoM., De DonnoG. and Di FilippoG.2014. Detection and imaging of piping sinkholes by integrated geophysical methods. Near Surface Geophysics12(3), 439–450.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CardarelliE. and CerretoA.2017. Grid setting in seismic tomography for elliptical anisotropic media. Pure and Applied Geophysics174(3), 1153–1165.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CardarelliE and CerretoA.2002. Ray tracing in elliptical anisotropic media using linear travel‐time seismic interpolation (LTI) method applied to travel time seismic tomography. Geophysical Prospecting50, 55–72.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CardarelliE., De DonnoG., OlivetiI. and ScatignoC.2016a. Assessing the state of conservation of a masonry building through the combined use of electrical and seismic tomography. 22nd European meeting of environmental and engineering geophysics, Barcelona, Spain, September 4–8.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CardarelliE., De DonnoG., ScatignoC., OlivetiI., MartinezM.P. and Prieto‐TaboadaN.2016b. Geophysical and geochemical techniques to assess the origin of rising damp of a Roman building (Ostia Antica archaeological site). Microchemical Journal129, 49–57.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CardarelliE. and De NardisR.1999. The use of 3‐D and 2‐D seismic tomography for assessing the physical integrity of building panels. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics3, 131–142.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CardarelliE. and De NardisR.2001. Seismic refraction, isotropic anisotropic seismic tomography on an ancient monument (Antonino and Faustina temple AD 141). Geophysical Prospecting49, 228–240.
   [Google Scholar]
10. CardarelliE. and Di FilippoG.2009. Integrated geophysical methods for the characterisation of an archaeological site (Massenzio Basilica— Roman forum, Rome, Italy). Journal of Applied Geophysics68(4), 508–521.
    [Google Scholar]
11. CataldoR., D’AgostinoD. and LeucciG.2012. Insight into the buried archaeological remains at the Duomo of Lecce (Italy) using ground penetrating radar surveys. Archaeological Prospection19(3), 157–165.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ClaussM.2001. The Roman Cult of Mithras: the God and His Mysteries.Taylor & Francis, Routledge, New York, 198 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ConyersL.B.2013. Ground‐Penetrating Radar for Archaeology,3rd edn. Latham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Alta Mira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. CreerS., DeinerK., FreyS., PorazinskaD., TaberletP., ThomasW.K.et al. 2016. The ecologist’s field guide to sequence‐based identification of biodiversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution7(9), 1008–1018
    [Google Scholar]
15. CrispimC.A. and GaylardeC.C.2005. Cyanobacteria and biodeterioration of cultural heritage: a review. Microbial Ecology49(1), 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DanielsD.J.2009. Ground Penetrating Radar,2nd edn. London, UK: IET734 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
17. D’ArannoP.J., De DonnoG., MarsellaM., OrlandoL., RenziB., SalvianiS.et al. 2016. High‐resolution geomatic and geophysical techniques integrated with chemical analyses for the characterization of a Roman wall. Journal of Cultural Heritage17(1), 141–150.
    [Google Scholar]
18. De DonnoG.2013. 2D tomographic inversion of complex resistivity data on cylindrical models. Geophysical Prospecting61(Suppl.1), 586–601.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De DonnoG. and CardarelliE.2014. 3D complex resistivity tomography on cylindrical models using EIDORS. Near Surface Geophysics12(5), 587–598.
    [Google Scholar]
20. De DonnoG. and CardarelliE.2017a. VEMI: a flexible interface for 3D tomographic inversion of time‐and frequency‐domain electrical data in EIDORS. Near Surface Geophysics15(1), 43–58.
    [Google Scholar]
21. De DonnoG. and CardarelliE.2017b. Tomographic inversion of timedomain resistivity and chargeability data for the investigation of landfills using a priori information. Waste Management59, 302–315.
    [Google Scholar]
22. FranzoniE.2014. Rising damp removal from historical masonries: a still open challenge. Construction and Building Materials54, 123–136.
    [Google Scholar]
23. GaffneyC.2008. Detecting trends in the prediction of the buried past: a review of geophysical techniques in archaeology. Archaeometry50, 313–36.
    [Google Scholar]
24. GamalloA.M.G.2003. The evolution of traditional types of building foundation prior to the first industrial revolution. Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, Spain, January 20–24.
    [Google Scholar]
25. GentiliniC.FranzoniE., BandiniS. and NobileL.2012. Effect of salt crystallisation on the shear behaviour of masonry walls: an experimental study. Construction and Building Materials37, 181–189.
    [Google Scholar]
26. GoodmanD. and PiroS.2013. GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology.Berlin, Germany: Springer, 233 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
27. GreenJ.L., BohannanB.J.M. and WhitakerR.J.2008. Microbial biogeography: from taxonomy to traits. Science320(5879), 1039–1043.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Merello GiménezP., Pérez GarcíaM.D.C., García DiegoF.J., Fernández NavajasÁ., Pérez MirallesJ., Baró ZarzoJ.L.et al. 2013. Ariadne’s house (Pompeii, Italy) wall paintings: a multidisciplinary study of its present state focused on a future restoration and preventive conservation. Materiales de Construcción63, 449–467.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MikhalovaM.V., BellottiP., ValeriP. and TortoraP.1999. Intrusion of seawater into the river part of the Tiber Month. Water Resources26(6), 679–686.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MolL. and PrestonP.R.2010. The writing’s in the wall: a review of new preliminary applications of electrical resistivity tomography within archaeology. Archaeometry52, 1079–1095.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MustafaK.2013. Deterioration of different stones used in historical buildings within Nigde province, Cappadocia. Construction and Building Materials48, 789–803.
    [Google Scholar]
32. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: an approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9(3), 135–156.
    [Google Scholar]
33. OrlandoL., CardarelliE., CercatoM. and De DonnoG.2015. Characterization of a pre‐Trajan wall by integrated geophysical methods. Archaeological Prospection22(3), 221–232.
    [Google Scholar]
34. OrlandoL. and SlobE., 2009. Using multicomponent GPR to monitor cracks in a historical building. Journal of Applied Geophysics67, 327–334.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Perez‐GraciaV., CasellesJ.O., ClapesJ., MartinezG. and OsorioR.2013. Non‐destructive analysis in cultural heritage buildings: evaluating the Mallorca cathedral sup‐porting structures. NDT & E International59, 40–47.
    [Google Scholar]
36. PiroS., GoodmanD. and NishimuraY.2003. The study and characterization of Emperor Traiano’s villa (Altopiani di Arcinazzo, Roma) using high‐resolution integrated geophysical surveys. Archaeological Prospection10(1), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
37. PolymenakosL., PapamarinopoulosS., MiltiadouA. and CharkiolakisN.2005. Investigation of the foundations of a Byzantine church by three‐dimensional seismic tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics57, 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SassO.2005. Rock moisture measurements: techniques, results, and implications for weathering. Earth Surf Process Landforms30, 359–374.
    [Google Scholar]
39. ScatignoC., GaudenziS., SammartinoM.P. and ViscoG.2016a. A microclimate study on hypogea environments of ancient roman building. The Science of the Total Environment,566–567.
    [Google Scholar]
40. ScatignoC., Prieto‐TaboadaN., MartinezM.P., ConteA.M., García‐DiegoF.J. and MadariagaJ.M.2016b. Analytical techniques for the characterisation of historical building materials: case study “Casa di Diana” Mithraeum (archeological site in Ostia Antica, Italy). In: Advances in Materials Science Research.Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York.
    [Google Scholar]
41. ScatignoC. and RaveraS.2015. Characterisation of the biological proliferation on Roman masonry case study: “Casa di Diana” Mithraeum (Ostia Antica, Rome – Italy). XXVIII Convegno Nazionale della Società Lichenologica Italiana in Lanciano (IT).
    [Google Scholar]
42. SinghD.P, SinghH.B. and PrabhaR.2016. Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity, Vol. 1: Research Perspectives. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
43. SoupiosP.M., LoupasakisC. and VallianatosF.2008. Reconstructing former urban environments by combining geophysical electrical methods and geotechnical investigations—An example from Chania, Greece. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering5(2), 186.
    [Google Scholar]
44. TsokasG.N., DiamantiN., TsourlosP.I., VargemezisG., StampolidisA. and RaptisK.T.2013. Geophysical prospection at the Hamza Bey (Alkazar) monument Thessaloniki, Greece. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry13, 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
45. TsourlosP.I. and TsokasG.N.2011. Non‐destructive electrical resistivity tomography survey at the south walls of the Acropolis of Athens. Archaeological Prospection18(3), 173–186.
    [Google Scholar]
46. WestleyK., PletsR. and QuinnR.2014. Holocene paleo‐geographic reconstructions of the Ramore Head Area, Northern Ireland, using geophysical and geotechnical data: paleo‐landscape mapping and archaeological implications. Geoarchaeology29(6), 411–430.
    [Google Scholar]