1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 16 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We adopt upward ground‐penetrating radar (up‐GPR) and water content reflectometry sensors to monitor the seasonal behaviour of snow density. Upward ground‐penetrating radar permitted observation at a single fixed station the time‐lapse response of the electromagnetic signal at the main frequency of 1500 MHz, with the antenna radiating upward from the soil toward the snow surface. Measurements have been performed at a test site on the Italian Alps (at an elevation of about 2100 m above sea level) during the 2014–2015 winter season at an interval of 30 minutes. The data processing of radar data involved the travel‐time picking and the conversion into snow depth and density. Water content reflectometry measurements have been useful in order to calibrate the radar response and retrieve information on the presence of liquid water content. The integration of upward ground‐penetrating radar and water content reflectometry technology allows us to infer snow high and layering, snow density changes during the winter season, and a preliminary estimate of the liquid water content. For snow in dry condition, we are able to estimate density values through mixing rules or polynomial formula. Snow density varies during the season in a range between 250 kg/m3 and 450 kg/m3; the results are in good agreement with the results of the ground truth. For snow in wet condition, the residuals of the electrical permittivity, after a trend removal on the original water content reflectometry data, permitted to estimate liquid water content in the range between 3% and 5%, during some periods of the winter season, according to warmer climate condition.

Snow layering and densification processes are monitored by the response of upward ground‐penetrating radar: fast phenomena such as wetting front infiltration can be also pointed out even if they appear challenging if other observations are not available (e.g., monitoring with water content reflectometry).

© European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
2017-10-01
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BoothA.D., MercerA., ClarkR., MurrayT., JanssonP. and AxtellC.2013. A comparison of seismic and radar methods to establish the thickness and density of glacier snow cover.Annals of Glaciology54(64), 73−82.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BradfordJ.H., HarperJ.T. and BrownJ.2009. Complex dielectric permittivity measurements from ground‐penetrating radar data to estimate snow liquid water content in the pendular regime.Water Resources Research45(8), W08403.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. BrulandO., SandK. and KillingtveitA.2000. Snow distribution at a high Arctic site at Svalbard.Nordic Hydrology32, 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DenothA.1994. An electronic device for long‐term snow wetness registration.Annals of Glaciology19, 104–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. EvansS.1965. Dielectric properties of ice and snow.Journal of Glaciology5, 773–792.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. FierzC., ArmstrongR.L., DurandY., EtcheversP., GreeneE., McClungD.M. et al. 2009. The International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground.IHP‐VII Technical Documents in Hydrology N°83, IACS Contribution N°1, UNESCO‐IHP, Paris.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ForteE., DossiM., ColucciR.R. and PipanM.2013. A new fast methodology to estimate the density of frozen materials by means of common offset GPR data.Journal of Applied Geophysics99, 135−145.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ForteE., PipanM., GodioA. and FranceseR.2015. An overview of GPR investigation in the Italian Alps.First Break33(8), 61–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GlenJ.W. and ParenJ.G.1975. The electrical properties of snow and ice.Journal of Glaciology15, 15–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GodioA.2008. Performance and experimental evidence of GPR in density estimates of snowpack.Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata49, 279–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GodioA.2009. Georadar measurements for snow cover density.American Journal of Applied Sciences6, 414–423.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GodioA.2016. Multi population genetic algorithm to estimate snow properties from GPR data.Journal of Applied Geophysics131, 133–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. GodioA. and RegeR.B.2015a. The mechanical properties of snow and ice of an alpine glacier inferred by integrating seismic and GPR methods.Journal of Applied Geophysics115, 92–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. GodioA., FrancoD., ChiaiaB., FrigoB., DublancL., FreppazM. et al. 2015b. Seasonal monitoring of snow properties by WCR and up‐GPR.21st European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, EAGE Near Surface Geoscience 2015, Turin, Italy.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. GodioA. and RegeR.B.2016. Analysis of georadar data to estimate the snow depth distribution.Journal of Applied Geophysics129, 92–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. HamelinJ., MehlJ.B. and MoldoverM.R.1998. The static dielectric constant of liquid water between 275 K and 400 K near the saturated vapor pressure.International Journal of Thermophysics19, 1359–1380.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. HeiligA., SchneebeliM. and EisenO.2009. Upward‐looking ground‐penetrating radar for monitoring snowpack stratigraphy.Cold Regions Science and Technology59(2–3), 152–162.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HeiligA., EisenO. and SchneebeliM.2010. Temporal observations of a seasonal snowpack using upward‐looking GPR.Hydrological Processes24(22), 3133–3145.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KellenersT.J., SeyfredM.S., BlonquistJ.M., BilskieJ. and ChandlerD.G.2005. Improved interpretation of water reflectometer measurements in soils.Soil Science Society of America Journal69, 1684–1690.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KohG., YankielunN.E. and BaptistaA.I.1996. Snow cover characterization using multiband FMCW radars.Hydrological Processes10, 1609–1617.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. KovacsA., GowA.J. and MoreyR.M.1995. The in‐situ dielectric constant of polar firn revisited.Cold Regions Science and Technology23, 245–256.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LooyengaH.1965. Dielectric constant of heterogeneous mixtures.Physica31, 401–406.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. LundbergA. and ThunehedH.2000. Snow wetness influence on impulse radar snow surveys: theoretical and laboratory study.Nordic Hydrology31(2), 89–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LundbergA., ThunehedH. and BergstromJ.2000. Impulse radar snow surveys – influence of snow density.Nordic Hydrology31, 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MarchandW.D., BrulandO. and KillingtveitA.2001. Improved measurements and analysis of spatial snow cover by combining a ground based radar system with a differential global positioning system receiver.Nordic Hydrology32, 181–194.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. PreviatiM., GodioA. and FerrarisS.2011. Validation of spatial variability of snowpack thickness and density obtained with GPR and TDR methods.Journal of Applied Geophysics75, 284–293.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. RegeR.B. and GodioA.2012. Multimodal inversion of guided waves in georadar data.Journal of Applied Geophysics81, 68–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. SandK. and BrulandO.1998. Application of georadar for snow cover surveying.Nordic Hydrology29, 361–370.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SchmidL., HeiligA., MittererC., SchweizerJ., MaurerH., OkornR. et al. 2014. Continuous snowpack monitoring using upward‐looking ground‐penetrating radar technology.Journal of Glaciology60, 221.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SchmidL., KochF., HeiligA., PraschM., EisenO., MauserW. and SchweizerJ.2015. A novel sensor combination (upGPR‐GPS) to continuously and nondestructively derive snow cover properties.Geophysical Research Letters42, 3397–3405.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. SchneebeliM., ColeouC., TouvierF. and LesaffreB.1998. Measurement of density and wetness in snow using time‐domain reflectometry.Annals of Glaciology26, 69–72
     [Google Scholar]
  32. SchweizerJ., JamiesonJ.B. and SchneebeliM.2003. Snow avalanche formation.Reviews of Geophysics41 (4), 1016.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. SihvolaA., NyforsE. and TiuriM.1985. Mixing formulae and experimental results for the dielectric constant of snow.Journal of Glaciology31, 163–170.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. SteinJ., LabergeG. and LèvesqueD.1997. Monitoring the dry density and the liquid water content of snow using time domain reflectometry.Cold Regions Science and Technology25, 123–136.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
Loading
Integration of upward GPR and water content reflectometry to monitor snow properties
Near Surface Geophysics 16, 154 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017060
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error