1887
Volume 66 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Physical modelling of cracked/fractured media using downscaled laboratory experiments has been used with great success as a useful alternative for understanding the effect of anisotropy in the hydrocarbon reservoir characterization and in the crustal and mantle seismology. The main goal of this work was to experimentally verify the predictions of effective elastic parameters in anisotropic cracked media by Hudson and Eshelby–Cheng's effective medium models. For this purpose, we carried out ultrasonic measurements on synthetic anisotropic samples with low crack densities and different aspect ratios. Twelve samples were prepared with two different crack densities, 5% and 8%. Three samples for each crack density presented cracks with only one crack aspect ratio, whereas other three samples for each crack density presented cracks with three different aspect ratios in their composition. It results in samples with aspect ratio values varying from 0.13 to 0.26. All the cracked samples were simulated by penny‐shaped rubber inclusions in a homogeneous isotropic matrix made with epoxy resin. Moreover, an isotropic sample for reference was constructed with epoxy resin only. Regarding velocity predictions performed by the theoretical models, Eshelby–Cheng shows a better fit when compared with the experimental results for samples with single and mix crack aspect ratio (for both crack densities). From velocity values, our comparisons were also performed in terms of the ε, γ, and δ parameters (Thomsen parameters). The results show that Eshelby–Cheng effective medium model fits better with the measurements of ε and γ parameters for crack samples with only one type of crack aspect ratio.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12544
2017-09-08
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AndersonD.L., MinsterB. and ColeD.1974. The effect of oriented cracks on seismic velocities. Journal of Geophysical Research79, 4011–4015.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., MinshullT.A. and LiX.‐Y.2015. Experimental observation of water saturation effects on shear wave splitting in synthetic rock with fractures aligned at oblique angles. Geophysical Journal International200, 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AssadJ.M.2005. The effect of orthorhombic anisotropy and its implication for oil recovery and reservoir exploitation. Geophysical Prospecting53, 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AssadJ.M., TathamR.H. and McDonaldJ.A.1992. A physical model study of microcrack‐induced anisotropy. Geophysics57, 1562–1570.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AssadJ.M., McDonaldJ.A., TathamR.H. and KuskyT.M.1996. Elastic wave propagation in a medium containing oriented inclusions with a changing aspect ratio: a physical model study. Geophysical Journal International125(1), 163–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChengC.H.1993. Crack models for a transversely anisotropic medium. Journal of Geophysical Research98, 675–684.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. CoatesR.T. and SchoenbergM.1995. Finite‐difference modeling of faults and fractures. Geophysics60, 1514–1526.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CrampinS.1981. A review of wave motion in anisotropic and cracked elastic media. Wave Motion3, 343–391.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CrampinS.1984a. An introduction to wave propagation in anisotropic media. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society76, 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CrampinS.1984b, Effective anisotropic elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society76, 135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CrampinS.McGonigleR. and AndoM.1986. Extensive‐dilatancy anisotropy beneath Mount Hood, Oregon and the effect of aspect ratio on seismic velocities through aligned cracks. Journal of Geophysical Research91, 12,703‐12,710.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De FigueiredoJ.J.S., SchleicherJ., StewartR.R. and DyaurN.2012. Estimating fracture orientation from elastic‐wave propagation. Journal of Geophysical Research117, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De FigueiredoJ.J.S., SchleicherJ., StewartR.R., DyaurN., OmoboyaO., WileyR. and WilliamA.2013. Shear wave anisotropy from aligned inclusions: ultrasonic frequency dependence of velocity and attenuation. Geophysical Journal International193, 475–488.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DoumaJ.1988. The effect of aspect ratio on crack‐induced anisotropy. Geophysical Prospecting, 36, 614–632.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. EkanemA.M., LiX.Y., ChapmanM., IanM. and WeiJ.2014. Effect of fracture aperture on P‐wave attenuation: a seismic physical modelling study. International Scholarly Research Notes Geophysics, Article ID 241279, 8 pages.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. EshelbyJ.D.1957. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 241, p. 376–396.
  17. GuéguenY. and KachanovM.2011. Effective elastic properties of cracked rocks—An overview. Mechanics of Crustal Rocks. Vienna: Springer, pp. 73–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GrechkaV. and KachanovM.2006. Effective elasticity of rocks with closely spaced and intersecting cracks. Geophysics71, D85–D91.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hudson, J.A.1980. Overall properties of a cracked solids, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 88, 371–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HudsonJ.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. NishizawaO.1982. Seismic velocity anisotropy in a medium containing oriented cracks—Transversely isotropic case. Journal of Physics of the Earth30, 3, 31–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RathoreJ.S, FjaerE., HoltR.M. and RenlieL.1995. P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy of a synthetic sandstone with controlled crack geometry. Geophysical Prospecting43, 711–728.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SaengerE.H. and ShapiroS.A.2002. Effective velocities in fractured media: a numerical study using the rotated staggered finite‐difference grid. Geophysical Prospecting50, 183–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. StewartR.R., DyaurN., OmoboyaB., de FigueiredoJ.J.S., WillisM. and SilS.2013. Physical modeling of anisotropic domains: ultrasonic imaging of laser‐etched fractures in glass. Geophyisics78(1), D11–D19.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SantosL.K., de FigueiredoJ.J.S., OmoboyaB., SchleicherJ., StewartR.R. and DyaurN.2015. On the source‐frequency dependence of fracture‐orientation estimates from shear‐wave transmission experiments. Journal of Applied Geophysics114, 81–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SantosL.K., de FigueiredoJ.J.S. and da SilvaC.B.2016. A study of ultrasonic physical modeling of isotropic media based on dynamic similitude. Ultrasonics70, 227–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ThomsenL.1995. Elastic anisotropy due to aligned cracks in porous rock. Geophysical Prospecting43, 805–829.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TillotsonP., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., McCannC., ShangxuW. et al. 2011. Observations of fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in synthetic porous rocks with aligned penny‐shaped fractures. Geophysical Prospecting59(1), 111–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TillotsonP., SothcottJ., BestA.I., ChapmanM. and LiX.‐Y.2012. Experimental verification of the fracture density and shear‐wave splitting relationship using synthetic silica cemented sandstones with a controlled fracture geometry. Geophysical Prospecting60, 516–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ZhangJ.2005. Elastic wave modeling in fractured media with an explicit approach. Geophysics70, T75–T85.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12544
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12544
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error