1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 65, Issue S1
  5. Article
Volume 65, Issue S1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Data interpolation is an important step for seismic data analysis because many processing tasks, such as multiple attenuation and migration, are based on regularly sampled seismic data. Failed interpolations may introduce artifacts and eventually lead to inaccurate final processing results. In this paper, we generalised seismic data interpolation as a basis pursuit problem and proposed an iteration framework for recovering missing data. The method is based on non‐linear iteration and sparse transform. A modified Bregman iteration is used for solving the constrained minimisation problem based on compressed sensing. The new iterative strategy guarantees fast convergence by using a fixed threshold value. We also propose a generalised velocity‐dependent formulation of the seislet transform as an effective sparse transform, in which the non‐hyperbolic normal moveout equation serves as a bridge between local slope patterns and moveout parametres in the common‐midpoint domain. It can also be reduced to the traditional velocity‐dependent seislet if special heterogeneity parametre is selected. The generalised velocity‐dependent seislet transform predicts prestack reflection data in offset coordinates, which provides a high compression of reflection events. The method was applied to synthetic and field data examples, and the results show that the generalised velocity‐dependent seislet transform can reconstruct missing data with the help of the modified Bregman iteration even for non‐hyperbolic reflections under complex conditions, such as vertical transverse isotropic (VTI) media or aliasing.

© 2017 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2017 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
2017-12-26
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbmaR. and KabirN.2006a. 3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm. Geophysics71, E91–E97.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AbmaR. and KabirN.2006b. Comparisons of interpolation methods in the presence of aliased events. 73rd annual international meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1909–1912.
  3. AmaldiE. and KannV.1998. On the approximability of minimizing nonzero variables or unsatisfied relations in linear systems. Theoretical Computer Science209, 237–260.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BiondiB. and PalacharlaG.1996. 3D prestack migration of common‐azimuth data. Geophysics61, 1822–1832.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BoßmannF. and MaJ.2015. Asymmetric chirplet transform for sparse representation of seismic data. Geophysics80, WD89–WD100.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. CastleR.J.1994. A theory of normal moveout. Geophysics59, 983–999.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ChenY., ZhangL. and MoL.2015. Seismic data interpolation using nonlinear shaping regularization. Journal of Seismic Exploration24, 327–342.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ChenZ., FomelS. and LuW.2013a. Accelerated plane‐wave destruction. Geophysics78, V1–V9.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenZ., FomelS. and LuW.2013b. Omnidirectional plane‐wave destruction. Geophysics78, V171–V179.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ClaerboutJ. and NicholsD.1991. Interpolation beyond aliasing by (t‐s) domain PEFs. 53rd annual international meeting, EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, A001.
  11. ClaerboutJ.F.1971. Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping. Geophysics36, 467–481.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ClaerboutJ.F.2000. Basic earth imaging. Stanford Exploration Project, http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/prof/.
  13. CohenA., DaubechiesI. and FeauveauJ.1992. Biorthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics45, 485–560.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. CurryW.2003. Interpolation sampled data with nonstationary, multiscale prediction‐error filters. 73rd SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1913–1916.
  15. DaubechiesI., DefriesM. and MolC.D.2004. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Communications on Pure and Applied MathematicsLVII, 1413–1457.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. DonohoD.L.2006. Compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory52, 1289–1306.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. DragosetW.H. and JericevicZ.1998. Some remarks on surface multiple attenuation. Geophysics63, 772–789.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. FomelS.2002. Applications of plane‐wave destruction filters. Geophysics67, 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. FomelS.2003. Seismic reflection data interpolation with differential offset and shot continuation. Geophysics68, 733–744.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. FomelS.2006. Towards the seislet transform. 76th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2847–2851a.
  21. FomelS.2008. Nonlinear shaping regularization in geophysical inverse problems. 78th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 2046–2051.
  22. FomelS.2010. Predictive painting of 3D seismic volumes. Geophysics75, A25–A30.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. FomelS. and GrechkaV.2001. Nonhyperbolic reflection moveout of P waves. An overview and comparison of reasons, in CWP‐372: Colorado School of Mines.
  24. FomelS. and GuittonA.2006. Regularizing seismic inverse problems by model reparameterization using plane‐wave construction. Geophysics71, A43–A47.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. FomelS. and LiuY.2010. Seislet transform and seislet frame. Geophysics75, V25–V38.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. FomelS., SavaP., VladI., LiuY. and BashkardinV.2013. Madagascar: open‐source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments. Journal of Open Research Software1, e8.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. FrenchM.S.1974. Two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional migration of model‐experiment reflection profiles. Geophysics39, 265–277.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. GaoJ., ChenX., LiJ., LiuG. and MaJ.2010. Irregular seismic data reconstruction based on exponential threshold model of POCS method. Applied Geophysics7, 229–238.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. GardnerG.G.F. and CanningA.1994. Effects of irregular sampling on 3D prestack migration. 64th SEG annual international meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1553–1556.
  30. GülünayN.2003. Seismic trace interpolation in the Fourier transform domain. Geophysics68, 355–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HerrmannF., WangD., HennenfentD. and MoghaddamP.2008. Curvelet‐based seismic data processing: a multiscale and nonlinear approach. Geophysics73, A1–A5.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. LianC., ChenK., ChenH. and ChenL.2001. Lifting based discrete wavelet transform architecture for JPEG2000. The 2001 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, IEEE, II445–II448.
  33. LiangJ., MaJ. and ZhangX.2014. Seismic data restoration via data‐driven tight frame. Geophysics79, V65–V74.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. LiuY. and FomelS.2010. OC‐seislet: seislet transform construction with differential offset continuation. Geophysics75, WB235–WB245.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LiuY. and FomelS.2011. Seismic data interpolation beyond aliasing using regularized nonstationary autoregression. Geophysics76, V69–V77.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LiuY., FomelS. and LiuC.2015. Signal and noise separation in prestack seismic data using velocity‐dependent seislet transform. Geophysics80, WD117–WD128.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MallatS.2009. A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way. Academic Press.
  38. MalovichkoA.A.1978. A new representation of the traveltime curve of reflected waves in horizontally layered media. Applied Geophysics (in Russian) 91, 47–53, English translation in Sword (1987).
     [Google Scholar]
  39. MoriceS., RonenS., CanterP., WelkerK. and ClarkD.2000. The impact of positioning differences on 4D repeatability. 70th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1611–1614.
  40. NaghizadehM. and InnanenK.A.2013. Two‐dimensional fast generalized Fourier interpolation of seismic records. Geophysical Prospecting61, 62–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. NaghizadehM. and SacchiM.2009. f‐x adaptive seismic‐trace interpolation. Geophysics74, V9–V16.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. OsherS., BurgerM., GoldfarbD., XuJ. and YingW.2005. An iterated regularization method for total variatrion‐based image restoration. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation4, 460–489.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. PorsaniJ.M.1999. Seismic trace interpolation using half‐step prediction filters. Geophysics64, 1461–1467.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. SpitzS.1991. Seismic trace interpolation in the f‐x domain. Geophysics56, 785–794.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. StoltR.H.2002. Seismic data mapping and reconstruction. Geophysics67, 890–908.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. StoneD.G.1994. Designing surveys in two and three dimension. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  47. SweldensW. and SchröderP.1996. Building your own wavelets at home, in Wavelets in Computer Graphics: ACM SIGGRAPH Course notes, 15–87.
  48. SwordC.H.1987. A Soviet look at datum shift. In SEP‐51: Stanford Exploration Project, 313–316.
  49. VerschuurD.J., BerkhoutA.J. and WapenaarC.P.A.1992. Adaptive surface‐related multiple elimination. Geophysics57, 1166–1177.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. WangX., GaoJ., ChenW. and YangC.2015. The seismic random noise attenuation method based on enhanced bandelet transform. Journal of Applied Geophysics116, 146–155.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. WangY.2002. Seismic trace interpolation in the f‐x‐y domain. Geophysics67, 1232–1239.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. XuS., ZhangY., PhamD. and LambaréG.2005. Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization. Geophysics70, V87–V95.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. YinW., OsherS., GoldfarbD. and DarbonJ.2008. Bregman iterative algorithms for l1 minimization with applications to compressed sensing. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences1, 143–168.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. YuS., MaJ., ZhangX. and SacchiM.D.2015. Interpolation and denoising of high‐dimensional seismic data. Geophysics80, V119–V132.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ZhangY., ZhangG. and BleisteinN.2003. True amplitude wave equation migration arising from true amplitude one‐way equations. Inversion Problem19, 1113–1138.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. ZwartjesP. and GisolfA.2007. Fourier reconstruction with sparse inversion. Geophysical Prospecting55, 199–221.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. ZwartjesP. and SacchiM.2007. Fourier reconstruction of nonuniformly sampled, aliased seismic data. Geophysics72, V21–V32.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
Loading
Seismic data interpolation using generalised velocity‐dependent seislet transform
Geophysical Prospecting 65, 82 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12578
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Interpolation; Iterative scheme; Seismic data processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error