1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 66, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 66, Issue 2
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Radio‐frequency electromagnetic tomography (or radio imaging method) employs radio‐frequency (typically 0.1–10 MHz) electromagnetic wave propagation to delineate the distribution of electric properties between two boreholes. Currently, the straight‐ray imaging method is the primary imaging method for the radio imaging method data acquired for mineral exploration. We carried out synthetic studies using three‐dimensional finite‐element modelling implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics to study the electromagnetic field characteristics and to assess the capability of the straight‐ray imaging method using amplitude and phase data separately. We studied four sets of experiments with models of interest in the mining setting. In the first two experiments, we studied models with perfect conductors in homogeneous backgrounds, which show that the characteristics of the electromagnetic fields depend mainly on the wavelength. When the borehole separations are less than one wavelength, induction effects occur; conductors with simple geometries can be recovered acceptably with amplitude data but are incorrectly imaged on the phase tomogram. When the borehole separations are longer than two wavelengths, radiation effects play a major role. In this case, phase tomography provides images with acceptable quality, whereas amplitude tomography does not provide satisfactory results. The third experiment shows that imaging with both original and reciprocal datasets is somewhat helpful in improving the imaging quality by reducing the impact of noise. In the last experiment, we studied models with conductive zones extended into the borehole plane with different lengths, which were not accurately recovered with amplitude tomography. The experiment implies that it is difficult to determine the extent of a mineralised zone that has been intersected by one of the boreholes. Due to the large variation of the wavelength in the radio‐frequency range, we suggest investigating the local electric properties to select an operating frequency prior to a survey. We conclude that straight‐ray tomography with either amplitude or phase data cannot provide high‐quality imaging results. We suggest using more general methods based on full electromagnetic modelling to interpret the data. In circumstances when computational time is critical, we suggest saving time by using either induction methods for borehole separations less than one wavelength or wave‐based methods (only radiation fields are considered) for borehole separation larger than two wavelengths.

© 2018 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2017 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
2017-05-25
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbubakarA., Van den BergP.M. and MallorquiJ.J.2002. Imaging of biomedical data using a multiplicative regularized contrast source inversion method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques50(7), 1761–1771.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. COMSOL Multiphysics User Guide
    COMSOL Multiphysics User Guide , 2012. Version 4.3 a, COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. DevaneyA.J.1984. Geophysical diffraction tomography. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingGE‐22(1), 3–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. DinesK.A. and LytleR.J.1979. Computerized geophysical tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE67(7), 1065–1073.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. HansenP.C. and Saxild‐HansenM.2012. AIR tools—a MATLAB package of algebraic iterative reconstruction methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics236(8), 2167–2178.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. HillD.1984. Radio propagation in a coal seam and the inverse problem. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards89(5), 385–394.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. HuismanJ.A., HubbardS.S., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar. Vadose Zone Journal2(4), 476–491.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. JacksonM.J. and TweetonD.R.1994. MIGRATOM: Geophysical tomography using wavefront migration and fuzzy constraints. Report of Investigation, RI 9497. Bureau of Mines, United States Department of Interior.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. JoachimowiczN., PichotC. and HugoninJ.P.1991. Inverse scattering: an iterative numerical method for electromagnetic imaging. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation39(12), 1742–1753.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Karimi‐SharifL.2013. Application of the cross‐hole radio imaging method in detecting geological anomalies, Maclennan township, Sudbury Ontario. Master thesis, Laurentian University, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. KorpisaloA. and HeikkinenE.2014. Radiowave imaging research (RIM) for determining the electrical conductivity of the rock in borehole section OL‐KR4−OL‐KR10 at Olkiluoto, Finland. Exploration Geophysics46(2), 141–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. KorpisaloA.L.2016. Electromagnetic geotomographic research on attenuating material using the middle radio frequency band. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. LiY. and SmithR.S.2015. Forward modeling of radio imaging (RIM) data with the Comsol RF module. Computers & Geosciences85, 60–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MacLennanK., KaraoulisM. and RevilA.2013. Complex conductivity tomography using low‐frequency crosswell electromagnetic data. Geophysics79(1), E23–E38.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. McDowellG.M., StewartR. and MonteiroR.N.2007. In‐mine exploration and delineation using an integrated approach. Proceedings of Exploration07, 571–589.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. MuttonA.J.2000. The application of geophysics during evaluation of the Century zinc deposit. Geophysics65(6), 1946–1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. NaprstekT. and SmithR.2016. SIRIM: an algorithm for forward modelling data from the radio imaging geophysical exploration method. Submitted to Computers & Geosciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. PalackyG.J.1987. Clay mapping using electromagnetic methods. First Break5(8), 295–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. RadcliffR.D. and BalanisC.1979. Reconstruction algorithms for geophysical applications in noisy environments. Proceedings of the IEEE67(7), 1060–1064.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. StevensK., WattsA. and RedkoG.2000. In‐mine applications of the radio‐wave method in the Sudbury igneous complex. 2000 SEG annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, P1130.
  21. ThomsonS. and HindeS.1993. Bringing geophysics into the mine: radio attenuation imaging and mine geology. Exploration Geophysics24(3–4), 805–810.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WardS.H. and HohmannG.W.1988. Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1 (ed M.N.Nabighian ), pp. 131–311. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. WilkinsonP.B.2005. Cross borehole electromagnetic tomography: scoping study and literature review. British Geological Survey, Internal Report IR/05/146.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. YingL.2006. Phase unwrapping. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, 1st edn (ed M.Akay ), pp. 1–12. Wiley‐Interscience.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. YuL. and EdwardsR.N.1997. On crosswell diffusive time‐domain electromagnetic tomography. Geophysical Journal International130(2), 449–459.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. YuL., ChouteauM., BoernerD.E. and WangJ.1998. On the imaging of radio‐frequency electromagnetic data for cross‐borehole mineral exploration. Geophysical Journal International135(2), 523–541.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
Loading
Modelling and straight‐ray tomographic imaging studies of cross‐hole radio‐frequency electromagnetic data for mineral exploration
Geophysical Prospecting 66, 282 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12516
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Electromagnetic; Numerical modelling; Tomography

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error