1887
Volume 66, Issue 3
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Hydraulic fractures generated by fluid injection in rock formations are often mapped by seismic monitoring. In many cases, the microseismicity is asymmetric relative to the injection well, which has been interpreted by stress gradient along the direction of the hydraulic fracture. We present a mathematical model of asymmetric hydrofracture growth based on relations between the solid‐phase stress and the fracture hydraulics. For single fracture and single injection point, the model has three parameters, hydraulic conductivities of the fracture wings, and normalised stress gradient and predicts the positions of the fracture tips as functions of time. The model is applied to a set of microseismic event locations that occurred during and after an injection process. Two different methods are suggested that make it possible to delineate the fracture tips from the set of microseismic events. This makes it possible to determine the model parameters and to check the agreement between the model prediction and the measured data. The comparison of the measured and modelled growth of fracture wings supports both the assumption of the non‐zero stress gradient and the existence of the post‐injection unilateral growth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12590
2017-11-20
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BiotM.A.1941. General theory of three‐dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics12, 155–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CattaneoC.1958. Sur une forme de l'équation de la chaleur éliminant le paradoxe d'une propagation instantanée. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences247(4), 431–433.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ChambersK., KendallJ.M., Brandsberg‐DahlS. and RuedaJ.2010. Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor microseismic activity. Geophysical Prospecting58(5), 817–826.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CornetF. and JulienP.1989. Stress determination from hydraulic test data and focal mechanisms of induced seismicity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 26(3–4), 235–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DahmT., HainzlS. and FischerT.2010. Bidirectional and unidirectional fracture growth during hydrofracturing: role of driving stress gradients. Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth, 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DuncanP.M. and EisnerL.2010. Reservoir characterization using surface microseismic monitoring. Geophysics75(5), A139–A146.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. EconomidesM. and NolteK.2003. Reservoir Stimulation. John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EvansK., CornetF., HashidaT., HayashiK., ItoT., MatsukiK.et al. 1999. Stress and rock mechanics issues of relevance to HDR/HWR engineered geothermal systems: review of developments during the past 15 years. Geothermics8(4–5), 455–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FischerT., HainzlS. and DahmT.2009. The creation of an asymmetric hydraulic fracture as a result of driving stress gradients. Geophysical Journal International179(1), 634–639.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FischerT., HainzlS., EisnerL., ShapiroS.A. and Le CalvezJ.2008. Microseismic signatures of hydraulic fracture growth in sediment formations: observations and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research‐Solid Earth113(B2).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. GeS.1997. A governing equation for fluid flow in rough fractures. Water Resources Research33(1), 53–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HakamiE., EinsteinH.H., GentierS. and IwanoM.1995. Characterisation of fracture apertures—Methods and parameters. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Rock Mechanics: Frontiers of Rock Mechanics Towards the 21st Century, Tokyo, Japan, September 1995.
  13. HakamiE. and LarssonE.1996. Aperture measurements and flow experiments on a single natural fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts33(4), 395–404.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HouseL.1987. Locating microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in crystalline rock. Geophysical Research Letters14(9), 919–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KochnevV., GozI., PolyakovV., MurtayevI., SavinV., ZommerB.et al. 2007. Imaging hydraulic fracture zones from surface passive microseismic data. First Break25, 77–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MlsJ.1999. A continuum approach to two‐phase porous media. Transport in Porous Media35(1), 15–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MlsJ.2007. Modelling groundwater flow and pollutant transport in hard rock fractures. In: Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow IV, Vol. 56 (eds A.A.Mamoli and C.A.Brebbia ), pp. 115–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MlsJ. and HerrmannL.2011. Oscillations for an equation arising in groundwater flow with the relaxation time. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis16(4), 527–536.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NordgrenR.1972. Propagation of a vertical hydraulic fracture. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal12(4), 306.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OyeV., ChavarriaJ. and MalinP.2004. Determining SAFOD area microearthquake locations solely with the pilot hole seismic array data. Geophysical Research Letters31(12).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PerkinsT. and KernL.1961. Widths of hydraulic fractures. Transactions of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME222(9), 937–949.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pyrak‐NolteL.J., CookN.G.W. and NolteD.D.1988. Fluid percolation through single fractures. Geophysical Research Letters15(11), 1247–1250.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. RutledgeJ. and PhillipsW.2003. Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, east Texas. Geophysics68(2), 441–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RutledgeJ., PhillipsW. and MayerhoferM. (2004). Faulting induced by forced fluid injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: an interpretation of hydraulic‐fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, Texas. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94(5), 1817–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ShapiroS.2000. An inversion for fluid transport properties of three‐dimensionally heterogeneous rocks using induced microseismicity. Geophysical Journal International143(3), 931–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ShapiroS., HuengesE. and BormG.1997. Estimating the crust permeability from fluid‐injection‐induced seismic emission at the KTB site. Geophysical Journal International131(2), F15–F18.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ShapiroS.A., DinskeC. and RothertE.2006. Hydraulic‐fracturing controlled dynamics of microseismic clouds. Geophysical Research Letters33(14).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. VeselyM. and MlsJ.2004. Water flow in a single fracture with variable aperture. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 52(2), 77–90.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12590
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12590
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aperture; Asperity; Asymmetric fracture; Fracture growth; Hydraulic fracture

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error