1887
PDF

Abstract

Seismic anisotropy is defined as the directional dependency of seismic phase velocities caused by the anisotropy in the elastic properties of medium. In the past 30 years of research on seismic anisotropy, it has become well known that subsurface materials are more anisotropic than the foreseen. An estimation of anisotropic properties becomes more important for processing seismic data and planning hydraulic fracturing. However, algebraic problems for estimating the anisotropic parameters from seismic data still remain due to the ill-posedness and the instability in the inverse mapping. It is, however, difficult to estimate directly all of 21 independent parameters in the general elastic medium in the 3D Cartesian coordinate system, and a method to deal with seismic anisotropy for complex anisotropic materials has been waited for.

In this study, we conduct numerical simulation for transversely isotropic medium (TI) which has 5 independent stiffness elements in 3-dimensional logging model. We propose a new parameterization strategy that minimizes the number of parameters so as to alleviate the ill-posedness and the instability: 7 parameters to express a general anisotropic medium. Instead of the full rank stiffness matrix for general triclinic materials, we assume a transversely isotropic material with horizontal axis of rotation (HTI) as an elastic medium with orientation and dip angles of the axis that becomes an analogue to general elastic medium. We attempt to estimate these parameters by full waveform strategy because azimuthal anisotropy influences the waveform. Since one of the crucial problems of FWI is the predicted model would be possible to converge to local minimum as the number of parameters increases, the small number of unknowns in the proposed strategy could play a key role to deal with complex anisotropy. As a result, all elements come close to true values by full waveform inversion process. Our results suggest that the proposed parameterization strategy and FWI have an advantage over the conventional methods in terms of accuracy and stability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140224
2018-05-24
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2018/chiba2018/Fuse_Satoshi.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140224&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alford, R. M.
    1986, Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy: Dilley, Texas, 56th Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstract, 476–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuse, S., Mikada, H. and Takekawa, J.
    , 2016, Full waveform inversion of cross-dipole acoustic waveforms, International Petroleum Tecnology Conference2016, IPTC-18726-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Hoop, M. V., Spencer, C. and Burridge, R.
    , 1999, The resolving power of seismic amplitude data: An anisotropic inversion/migration approach. Geophysics, 64(3), 852–873.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tarantola, A.
    , 1986, A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data, Geophysics, 51 (10), 1893–1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Takekawa, J., H.Mikada, and T.Goto
    , 2014, A Hamiltonian particle method with a staggered particle technique for simulating seismic wave propagation, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171 (8), 1747–1757.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamath, N., and Tsvankin, I.
    , 2016, Elastic full-waveform inversion for VTI media: Methodology and sensitivity analysis, Geophysics, 81 (2), C53–C68.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergslid, T. S., Birger Raknes, E., and Arntsen, B.
    , 2015, The influence of anisotropy on elastic full-waveform inversion. 85th Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstract, 1425–1429.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butzer, S., KurzmannA., and Bohlen, T.
    , 2013, 3D elastic full-waveform inversion of small-scale heterogeneities in transmission geometry, Geophysical Prospecting, 61 (6), 1238–1251.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., and Reshef, M.
    , 1985, A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations, Geophysics, 50 (4), 705–708.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishikura, K., H.Mikada, T.Goto and J.Takekawa
    , 2014, Estimation of fluid contact in terms of attenuation, 84th Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 623–627.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimball, C. V., and Marzetta, T. L.
    , 1984, Semblance processing of borehole acoustic array data, Geophysics, 49 (3), 274–281
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kitsunezaki, C.
    , 1981, A new method for shear-wave logging, Geophysics, 45 (5), 1489–1506.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saenjer, E. H., and Bohlen, T.
    , 2004, Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid, Geophysics, 69 (8), 583–591.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomsen, L.
    , 1986, Weak elastic anisotropy, Geophysics, 51 (10), 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    , 2009, An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140224
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140224
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error