1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic data sometimes contain weak reflection signal because of complex subsurface structure, weak contrast interfaces and long travel time. The weak signal is hardly to detect and always carry detailed subsurface’s information, which is important for the small-scale structure and details imaging. For detection of weak signal, we present novel mathematical morphology based technique that can detect weak signal from the aspect of the shape of seismic wave. In the presented techniques, the seismic data are first decomposed into a number of multi-scale morphological components and then several components corresponding to the shape of signal are selected for the reconstruction of weak signal. A non-stationary weighting operator is introduced to the process of reconstruction to reinforce the extraction of weak signal from the selected components. The reconstruction of weak signal is formulized as an regularized inversion problem. The regularized non-stationary method can be understood as a non-stationary matching filtering method, where the matching filter has the same size as the data to be filtered. A field data example demonstrates a successful performance of the presented technique.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800940
2018-06-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, Y. and Fomel, S.
    [2015] Random noise attenuation using local signal-and-noise orthogonalization. Geophysics, 80(6), WD1–WD9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, Y., Zhang, D., Jin, Z., Chen, X., Zu, S., Huang, W. and Gan, S.
    [2016] Simultaneous denoising and reconstruction of 5-D seismic data via damped rank-reduction method. Geophysical Journal International, 206(3), 1695–1717.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Y., Zhou, Y., Chen, W., Zu, S., Huang, W. and Zhang, D.
    [2017] Empirical Low-Rank Approximation for Seismic Noise Attenuation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fomel, S.
    [2007] Shaping regularization in geophysical-estimation problems. Geophysics, 72(2), R29–R36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbons, S. J. and Ringdal, F.
    [2006] The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation. Geophysical Journal International, 165(1), 149–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, W. and Wang, R.
    [2018] Random noise attenuation by planar mathematical morphological filtering. Geophysics, 83(1), V11–V25.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, W., Wang, R., Chen, X. and Chen, Y.
    [2017] Double Least-Squares Projections Method for Signal Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 55(7), 4111–4129.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, W., Wang, R., Chen, Y., Li, H. and Gan, S.
    [2016] Damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis for 3D random noise attenuation. Geophysics, 81(4), V261–V270.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, H., Wang, R., Cao, S., Chen, Y. and Huang, W.
    [2016] A method for low-frequency noise suppression based on mathematical morphology in microseismic monitoring. Geophysics, 81(3), V159–V167.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maragos, P.
    [1994] Morphological systems: slope transforms and max-min difference and differential equations. Signal Processing, 38(1), 57–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mousavi, S.M. and Langston, C.A.
    [2016] Hybrid Seismic Denoising Using Higher-Order Statistics and Improved Wavelet Block Thresholding. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800940
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800940
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error