A Staggered Approach to Extract Remanent Magnetization from Magnetization Vector Inversions Using an Active Source

References

1. Beard, L.P. and Nyquist, J.E.
   [1998] Simultaneous inversion of airborne electromagnetic data for resistivity and magnetic permeability. Geophysics, 63(5), 1556–1564.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Clark, D.A.
   [2014] Methods for determining remanent and total magnetisations of magnetic sources – a review. Exploration Geophysics, 45(4), 271.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Čuma, M., Wilson, G.A. and Zhdanov, M.S.
   [2012] Large-scale 3D inversion of potential field data. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(6), 1186–1199.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Farquharson, C.G., Oldenburg, D.W. and Routh, P.S.
   [2003] Simultaneous 1D inversion of loop–loop electromagnetic data for magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity. Geophysics, 68(6), 1857–1869.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Foss, C.A.
   [2006a] Evaluation of strategies to manage remanent magnetization effects in magnetic field inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2006, 938–942.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Foss, C.A.
   [2006b] Improvements in source resolution that can be expected from inversion of magnetic field tensor data. The Leading Edge, 25(1), 81–84.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Günther, T., Rücker, C. and Spitzer, K.
   [2006] Three-dimensional modelling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography - II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 166(2), 506–517.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Huang, H. and Fraser, D.C.
   [2001] Mapping of the resistivity, susceptibility, and permittivity of the earth using a helicopter-borne electromagnetic system. Geophysics, 66(1), 148–157.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kubota, R., and UchiyamaA.
   , 2005, Three-dimensional magnetization vector inversion of a seamount: Earth, Planets and Space, 57, 691–699, doi: 10.1186/BF03351849.
   https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351849 [Google Scholar]
10. Lange, T. and Büchel, G.
    [1917] Hochauflösende geomagnetische Rasterkartierung des Stohner- und Sprinker Lavastroms im Alfbachtal – Quartäres Vulkanfeld der Westeifel. Mainer geowiss. Mitt, 45, 177–202
    [Google Scholar]
11. Li, Y., Shearer, S.E., Haney, M.M. and Dannemiller, N.
    [2010] Comprehensive approaches to 3D inversion of magnetic data affected by remanent magnetization. Geophysics, 75(1), L1–L11.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Li, Y. and Sun, J.
    [2016] 3D magnetization inversion using fuzzy c -means clustering with application to geology differentiation. Geophysics, 81(5), WC1–WC18.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Noh, K., Lee, K.H., Oh, S., Seol, S.J. and Byun, J.
    [2017] Numerical evaluation of active source magnetics as a method for imaging high-resolution near-surface magnetic heterogeneity. Geophysics, 82(5), J27–J38.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schiffler, M.
    [2015] Enhancements in Processing, Analysis and Inversion of Full Tensor Magnetic Gradiometry Data., Dissertation. Jena.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Stolz, R., Zakosarenko, V., Schulz, M., Chwala, A., Fritzsch, L., Meyer, H.-G. and Köstlin, E.O.
    [2006] Magnetic full-tensor SQUID gradiometer system for geophysical applications. The Leading Edge, 25(2), 178–180.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Tschirhart, P., Morris, B. and Hodges, G.
    [2013] A new regional/residual separation for magnetic data sets using susceptibility from frequency-domain electromagnetic data. Geophysics, 78(6), B351–B359.
    [Google Scholar]