1887

Abstract

Summary

Blended/simultaneous source shooting is becoming more widely used in seismic exploration and monitoring, which can provide significant uplift in terms of both acquisition quality and economic efficiency. Effective deblending techniques are essential in order to make use of existing processing and imaging methodologies. When dealing with coarse and/or irregularly sampled blended data, the aliasing noises of incomplete data will affect the deblending process and the crosstalk in the blended data will also have a bad influence on the process of data reconstruction. In this work, we propose a joint deblending and data reconstruction method using the double focal transformation to eliminate blending noise and aliasing noise in the coarse, blended data. Synthetic and numerically blended field data examples demonstrate the validity of its application for deblending and data reconstruction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801533
2018-06-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J.
    [2008] Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge, 27(7), 924–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao, J., Kontakis, A., Verschuur, D.J. and Gu, H.
    [2017]. Deblending using focal transformation with a greedy inversion solver. 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition meeting, Extended Abstracts, We P3 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampson, G., Stefani, J., and Herkenhoff, F.
    [2008]. Acquisition using simultaneous sources. The Leading Edge, 27(7):918–923.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Herrmann, FJ.
    , [2010]. Randomized sampling and sparsity: Getting more information from fewer samples. Geophysics, 75(6), WB173–WB187.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kontakis, A., and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2014]. Deblending via a sparsity-constrained inversion in the focal domain. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition meeting, Extended Abstracts, Th ELI2 02.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kutscha, H. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2012]. Data reconstruction via sparse double focal transformation: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(4), 53–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Spagnolini, U. and Opreni, S.
    [1996]. 3-D shot continuation operator. 66th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 439–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Spitz, S.
    [1991]. Seismic trace interpolation in the FX domain. Geophysics, 56(6), 785–794.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Trad, D.O., Ulrych, T.J. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2002]. Accurate interpolation with high-resolution time-variant Radon transforms. Geophysics, 67(2), 644–656.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Den Berg, E. and Friedlander, M.P.
    [2008]. Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(2), 890–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. and Wapenaar, C.P.A.
    [1992]. Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination: Geophysics, 57(9), 1166–1177.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, S., Zhang, Y. and Lambaré, G
    [2010]. Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization in higher dimensions. Geophysics, 75(6), WB113–WB120.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801533
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801533
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error