1887
Volume 66, Issue 5
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We propose a three‐step bandwidth enhancing wavelet deconvolution process, combining linear inverse filtering and non‐linear reflectivity construction based on a sparseness assumption. The first step is conventional Wiener deconvolution. The second step consists of further spectral whitening outside the spectral bandwidth of the residual wavelet after Wiener deconvolution, i.e., the wavelet resulting from application of the Wiener deconvolution filter to the original wavelet, which usually is not a perfect spike due to band limitations of the original wavelet. We specifically propose a zero‐phase filtered sparse‐spike deconvolution as the second step to recover the reflectivity dominantly outside of the bandwidth of the residual wavelet after Wiener deconvolution. The filter applied to the sparse‐spike deconvolution result is proportional to the deviation of the amplitude spectrum of the residual wavelet from unity, i.e., it is of higher amplitude; the closer the amplitude spectrum of the residual wavelet is to zero, but of very low amplitude, the closer it is to unity. The third step consists of summation of the data from the two first steps, basically adding gradually the contribution from the sparse‐spike deconvolution result at those frequencies at which the residual wavelet after Wiener deconvolution has small amplitudes. We propose to call this technique “sparsity‐enhanced wavelet deconvolution”. We demonstrate the technique on real data with the deconvolution of the (normal‐incidence) source side sea‐surface ghost of marine towed streamer data. We also present the extension of the proposed technique to time‐varying wavelet deconvolution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12545
2018-05-29
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeckA. and TeboulleM.2009. A fast iterative shrinkage‐thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences2, 183–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BroadheadM.K. and TonellotT.L.2010. Sparse seismic deconvolution by method of orthogonal matching pursuit. EAGE Expanded Abstracts, Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DaubechiesI, DefriesM. and MolC.D.2004. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1414–1457.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FerberR., CaprioliP. and WestL.2013. L1 pseudo‐Vz estimation and deghosting of single‐component marine towed‐streamer data. Geophysics78, WA21–WA26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. FoucartS. and RauhutH.2013. A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing. Birkhäuser
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DonohoD.L.1995. Denoising by soft thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory41, 613–627.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HargreavesN., TreitelS. and SmithM.2013. Frequency extension, resolution, and sparse inversion. SEG Expanded Abstracts, Houston.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LevyS. and FullagarP.K.1981. Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and application to high‐resolution deconvolution. Geophysics46, 1235–1243.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MomohE., HallidayD., FerberR. and SinghS.2016. Low‐frequency signal enhancement by pseudo‐Vz deghosting. First Break34, 35–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. OlivieraS.A.M. and LupinacciW.A.2013. L1 norm inversion method for deconvolution in attenuating media. Geophysical Prospecting61, 771–777.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SacchiM.D., VelisD.R. and CominguezA.H.1994. Minimum entropy deconvolution with frequency domain constraints. Geophysics59, 938–946.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SinghS.C., HanantoN.D. and ChauchanP.S.2011. Enhanced reflectivity of backthrusts in the recent great Sumatran earthquake rupture zones. Geophysical Research Letters38, L04302.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TaylorH.L., BanksS.C. and McCoyJ.F.1979, Deconvolution with the L1 norm. Geophysics44, 39–52.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12545
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12545
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error