1887

Abstract

Summary

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is widely used to collect the data from near surface depth. GPR data allow the users to visualize and interpret the underground structures quickly and with high accuracy. The obtained accuracy depends on such data collection parameters as sampling rate, trace and profile intervals. In order to visualize the underground structure with high accuracy, the sampling rate should be selected high and the trace and profile intervals should be selected small. Due to the high sampling rate and small trace and profile intervals the size of the collected GPR data becomes bigger. However, collecting the big data will increase both cost and time loss. In this paper, a methodology and Mean interpolation technique are proposed to reduce the cost and time loss by decreasing the size of collected data as much as possible and to increase an accuracy of underground structures by applying the interpolation techniques to the collected raw data. The proposed Mean and standard Cubic and Linear interpolation techniques were implemented on real GPR data. The obtained results showed that the similarity ratio between original and interpolated GPR data is about 95–98%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801807
2018-05-14
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annan, A.P.
    ,[2009]. Electromagnetic Principles of Ground Penetrating Radar. In Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications, edited by Harry M.Jol, pp. 3–40. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y. and Cohen, I.
    [2009]. Pearson correlation coefficient. Noise reduction in speech processing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conyers, L.B.
    [2004]. Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. AltaMira Press, Lanham.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dojack, L.
    [2012]. Ground Penetrating Radar Theory, Data Collection, Processing, and Interpretation: A Guide for Archaeologists, 7–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Meijering, E. and Michael, U.
    [2003]. A note on cubic convolution interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing12, 477–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Strange, A.D.
    [2013]. Analysis of Time Interpolation for Enhanced Resolution GPR Data. In: The 7th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, Nantes, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Samet, R. and Özkan, M.
    [2016]. Incomplete Data Production Techniques in GPR Research and Applications. In: The 15th International Conference Geoinformatics, Kiev, Ukraine.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Özkan, M. And Samet, R. [2017]. Interpolation Techniques to Recover The Incomplete GPR Data. In: The 16th International Conference Geoinformatics, Kiev, Ukraine.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801807
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801807
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error