1887

Abstract

Summary

Inverted time-lapse seismic data are rich with respect to information about reservoir fluid flows. Ensemblebased data assimilation (EDA) of such spatially dense data into reservoir models requires a sufficiently large number of degrees of freedom (DOF). The DOF in straightforward EDA equals the ensemble size, E. Only a moderately sized E is, however, computationally feasible for large reservoir models. To increase the DOF, localization is routinely applied, but successful localization requires preconceived knowledge of the specific case and substantial manual effort. Alternative methods for increasing the DOF are therefore desirable. The large imbalance between data-space size (DSS) and DOF for problems with spatially dense data emphasizes this further.

We have considered generic methods for better balancing DSS and DOF. To decrease the DSS we used coarse data representation (CDR) of spatially dense data, that is, we map the data onto a regularly coarsened grid using averaging. To increase E (and, hence, the DOF) without increasing the computational cost of an ensemble forward run, we used simulations on a regularly coarsened grid with simple upscaling of reservoir properties (CGU). Results obtained with a combination of CDR and CGU, where the data and simulation grids were coarsened to the same level, were very good, but the optimal level varied from one case to another.

To avoid manual selection of an optimal level, we consider multilevel EDA using the novel Multilevel Hybrid EnKF (MlHEnKF) in combination with multilevel data representation (MDR) on a sequence of regularly coarsened grids. The resulting EDA method - MlHEnKF with MDR - can be applied in conjunction with localization, if desired. Assimilating inverted time-lapse seismic data in a reservoir-history-matching example, we assess the performance of the MlHEnKF with MDR by comparing the results to those obtained with a standard EDA approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802144
2018-09-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Axelsson, O.
    [1994] Iterative Solution Methods.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgers, G., van Leeuwen, P.J. and Evensen, G.
    [1998] Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev., 126(6), 1719–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davolio, A., Maschio, C. and Schiozer, D.J.
    [2012] Pressure and saturation estimation from P and S impedances: A theoretical study. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9(5), 447–460.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dong, Y., Gu, Y. and Oliver, D.S.
    [2006] Sequential assimilation of 4D seismic data for reservoir description using the ensemble Kalman filter.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 53(1–2), 83–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Emerick, A.A. and Reynolds, A.C.
    [2012] History matching time-lapse seismic data using the ensemble Kalman filter with multiple data assimilations. Comput. Geosci., 16(3), 639–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2013] Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation.Computers and Geosciences, 55, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Evensen, G.
    [1994] Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res, 99(10), 110–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [2018] Analysis of iterative ensemble smoothers for solving inverse problems.Computational Geosciences, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fahimuddin, A.
    [2010] 4D Seismic History Matching Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF): Possibilities and Challenges. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fossum, K. and Mannseth, T.
    [2017] Coarse-scale data assimilation as a generic alternative to localization. Computational Geosciences, 21(1), 167–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fossum, K., Mannseth, T. and Stordal, A.S.
    [2018] Multilevel ensemble based data assimilation.Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles, M.B.
    [2015] Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numerica, 24(2015), 259–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoel, H., Law, K.J.H. and Tempone, R.
    [2016] Multilevel Ensemble Kalman Filtering. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 54(3), 1813–1839.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Houtekamer, P.L. and Mitchell, H.L.
    [2001] A Sequential Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev., 129(1), 123–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalman, R.E.
    [1960] A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J. Basic Eng., 82(1), 35–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Le Gland, F., Monbet, V. and Tran, V.D.
    [2011] Large Sample Asymptotics for the Ensemble Kalman Filter. In: Crisan, D. and Rozovskii, B. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leeuwenburgh, O., Brouwer, J. and Trani, M.
    [2010] Ensemble-based conditioning of reservoir models to seismic data. Comput. Geosci., 15(2), 359–378.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mannseth, T. and Fossum, K.
    [2018] Assimilating spatially dense data for subsurface applications—balancing information and degrees of freedom. under review.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schlumberger Ltd
    . [2009] ECLIPSE Reservoir Simulation Software: Technical Description.Schlum-berger Software, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Skjervheim, J.A. and Evensen, G.
    [2011] An Ensemble Smoother for assisted History Matching. In: Proceedings of SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2003. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Skjervheim, J.A., Evensen, G., Aanonsen, S.I., Ruud, B.O. and Johansen, T.A.
    [2007] Incorporating 4D Seismic Data in Reservoir Simulation Models Using Ensemble Kalman Filter. SPE Journal, 12(03), 282–92.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802144
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802144
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error