1887

Abstract

Summary

Results from two ERT performed on an empty small-scale pilot plant are presented illustrating the electrical current pathways in the presence of a conductive layer electrically insulated and partially insulated from the surrounding environment by a geomembrane. An ERT acquired on an operating cell of a real landfill where electrical connection is present between the inner medium (leachate, waste and covering soil) and the outside environment is also presented. Both results draw attention to the need of considering the slope of cell walls when interpreting ERT models from a survey performed on an operating landfill, since it is possible that the conductive bottom layers couldn’t be related with a hole or other sort of defect on the geomembrane, which could facilitate the environment contamination, but with the deviated electrical pathways through waste and leachate. In this case a good topographical mapping before and after the cell’s exploration is a key factor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802622
2018-09-09
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ASTM D7007 16 [2016] Standard Practices for Electrical Methods for Locating Leaks in Geomembranes Covered with Water or Earthen Materials.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barroso, M., Mota, R., Coimbra, L., Lopes, M.G., Matutino, M., Dores, R. and Silva, F.
    [2013] Semi-automatic mobile system for detecting defects in landfill liners: Tests in a pilot plant at LNEC, International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering, Hammamet, Tunisia.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwards, L.S.
    [1977] A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP, Geophysics, 42, 1020–1036.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mota, R., Matutino, P.M., Barroso, M., Lopes, M.G., Dores, R. and Silva, F.
    [2011] Laboratorial prototype for detection of defects on geomembranes – the geophysical approach, 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Extended Abstracts, P34.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mota, R., Coimbra, L., Barroso, M., Matutino, M., Lopes, M.G., Dores, R. and Silva, F.
    [2013] Semi-automatic mobile equipment test for detecting holes in geomembranes – the prototypes evolution, 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Extended Abstracts, MoP11.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nosko, V. and TouzeFoltz, N.
    [2000] Geomembrane Liner Failure: Modelling of Its Influence on Contaminant Transfer. EuroGeo2, 2, 557–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Peggs, I.D.
    [1996] Defect Identification, Leak Location, and Leak Monitoring in Geomembrane. Geosynthetics: Applications, Design and Construction, 611–618.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Peggs, I.D. and Wallance, R.B.
    [2008] Challenges and Lessons Learned During Geoelectric Leak Location Surveys on a Complex Triple Lining System. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 705–711.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rollin, A.L., Jacquelin, T., Forgot, B. and Saunier, P.
    [2004] A Guide to Detect Leaks on Installed Geomembranes. EuroGeo 3, 1, 235–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rollin, A.L., Marcotte, M. and Chaput, L.
    [2002] Lessons Learned from Geo-Electrical Leaks Surveys. 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2, 527–530.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802622
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802622
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error