1887
Volume 16, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Val‐Richer in Normandy is recognised as the place of origin of the resistivity method in applied geophysics. There, during the summer of 1912, Conrad Schlumberger tested for the first time a new method designed to map out the electrical resistivity of the sub‐surface. A well‐known, hand‐drawn blueprint made by Conrad Schlumberger describes this experiment. It shows the voltage distribution observed at the ground surface together with a hand‐written comment describing the difficulties encountered and the solutions retained. This test led the Schlumberger brothers to develop this type of prospection and to later create, first, an engineering office in 1920 and, then, companies among the largest international ones in the oil service industry.

In 2014, 102 years after this founding experiment, a research project was initiated with the main objective to delineate the remains of the Val‐Richer Abbey, which were destroyed during the French Revolution. A resistivity survey was conducted complemented by an electromagnetic survey over the area where the abbey's religious buildings were expected to be located, the same place where Conrad Schlumberger's measurements were carried out. The interpretation of the geophysical survey, in the light of archival sources and current knowledge of the Cistercian abbeys of Normandy, has completely altered our previous vision of the Val‐Richer Abbey and made it possible to establish an accurate outline of this monastic settlement. The knowledge about sub‐surface electrical resistivity authorises a renewed analysis of the 1912 blueprint and associated drawings and a new assessment of the solutions then adopted by Conrad Schlumberger, whose major idea was the injection of DC rather than AC current to avoid induction effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017063
2018-07-27
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AllaudL. and MartinM.1976. Schlumberger Histoire d'une technique. Berger‐Levrault, Paris
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BrinonC., SimonF.‐X. and TabbaghA.2012. Rapid 1D/3D inversion of shallow resistivity multipole data: examples in archaeological prospection. Geophysics77–3, E193–E201.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DabasM., AnestA., ThiessonJ. and TabbaghA.2016. Slingram EMI devices for characterizing resistive features using apparent conductivity measurements: check of the DualEM‐421S instruments and field tests. Archaeological Prospection23–3, 165–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gruner‐SchlumbergerA.1977. La boite magique ou les sources du pétrole. Arthème Fayard, Paris
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KunetzG.1966. Principles of Direct Current Resistivity Prospecting. Geoexploartion monographs 1‐1, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RobinC.2003. Conrad et Marcel Schlumberger: une aventure industri‐ elle originale. Bulletin de la Sabix34, 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SchlumbergerC.1912. Premières expériences. Carte des courbes équi‐ potentielles, tracées au courant continu Val‐Richer (Calvados). Août‐ Septembre 1912. Ref 4717, Musée de Crèvecoeur en Auge, Calvados, France.
  8. TabbaghA.1986. What is the best coil orientation in the slingram elec‐ tromagnetic prospecting method? Archaeometry28–2, 185–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. VincentJ.‐B.2014. Les abbayes cisterciennes de Normandie (XIIe‐XIVe siècle): Conception, Organisation, Évolution, 2 volumes, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Rouen.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017063
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017063
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error