Multi-Physics Workflows For Quantitative Interpretation Of Seismic And Csem Data

References

1. Alvarez, P., Marcy, F., Vrijlandt, M., Skinnemoen, O., MacGregor, L., Nichols, K., Keirstead, R., Bolivar, F., Bouchrara, S., Smith, M., Tseng, H-W & Rappke, J.
   , 2018. Multi-physics characterisation of reservoir prospects in the Hoop area of the Barents Sea, Interpretation, 6 (3), SG1–SG17.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alvarez, P., Alvarez, A., MacGregor, L., Bolivar, F., Keirstead, R. & Martin, T.
   , 2017. Reservoir property prediction using CSEM, pre-stack seismic and well log data: Case study in the Hoop Area, Barents Sea, Norway, 2017, Interpretation, 5, SE43–SE60
   [Google Scholar]
3. Andreis, D., MacGregor, L., Grana, D. & Ellis, M.
   , 2018. Overcoming scale incompatibility in petrophysical joint inversion of surface seismic and CSEM data. SEG Annual Meeting 2018, Expanded abstract.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Avseth, P., T.Mukerji, and G.Mavko
   , 2005, Quantitative seismic interpretation -Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gallardo, L. A., and M. A.Meju
   , 2004, Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel-time inversion with cross-gradients constraints, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B033111–B0331111
   [Google Scholar]
6. Meju, M., Saleh, A., Mackie, R., Miorelli, F., Miller, R. & Mansor, N.
   , 2017. Workflow for improvement of 3D anisotropic CSEM resistivity inversion and integration with seismic using cross gradient constraint to reduce exploration risk in a complex fold-thrust belt in offshore northwest Borneo, Interpretation, 6, SG49–SG57
   [Google Scholar]