Effect of Chemical Calcite Dissolution by CO2 on Seismic Velocities and Attenuation – Numerical Study

References

1. Andra, H.et al.
   [2013] Digital rock physics benchmarks—part II: Computing effective properties. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 33–43.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Lebedev, M.et al.
   [2017] Carbon geosequestration in limestone: Pore-scale dissolution and geomechanical weakening. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 66, 106–119.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Masson, Y. J. and Pride, S. R.
   [2010] Finite-difference modeling of Biot's poroelastic equations across all frequencies. Geophysics, 75(2), N33–N41.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Novikov, M.et al.
   [2017] Numerical study of fracture connectivity response in seismic wavefields. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, 3786–3790.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Reshetova, G. and Hachkova, T.
   [2018] Numerical Computation of Effective Elastic Parameters of Rock Samples by 2d and 3d Numerical Images. 8th EAGE Saint Petersburg International Conference and Exhibition edited, Saint Petersburg.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Rubino, J. G.et al.
   [2014] Seismoacoustic signatures of fracture connectivity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(3), 2252–2271.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Sim, C. Y. and Adam, L.
   [2016] Are changes in time-lapse seismic data due to fluid substitution or rock dissolution? A CO2 sequestration feasibility study at the Pohokura Field, New Zealand. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(4), 967–986.
   [Google Scholar]